Abstract:Introduction: This study aimed to identify the characteristics of cranial-base morphology in platybasic and nonplatybasic patients with palatal anomalies and velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) compared with control subjects to investigate structural factors related to craniofacial morphology that affect the nasopharyngeal space and may influence velopharyngeal function, and to develop precise treatments for specific patients with VPD. Methods: Three hundred eighty-six patients with VPD and various palatal anomalies were studied retrospectively. The control group included 126 healthy patients with normal speech. Lateral cephalometric images assessed craniofacial morphology. Results: Nonplatybasic patients and control subjects had larger SNA, S-Ba-Ptm, and N-Ba-PP angles (in the craniomaxillary complex), and platybasic patients had larger nasopharyngeal ANS-Ptm-Ve and Ba-S-Ptm angles and longer Ve-T and Ve-Ba distances than the nonplatybasic patients. All study patients had larger ANB, Gn-Go-Ar, and PP-MP angles (in the craniomandibular complex). Nonplatybasic patients had smaller Ba-SN angles than platybasic patients and controls because of more acute N-S-Ptm angle. Among the nonplatybasic patients, Ve-T length tended to be shorter (with no significant difference between groups) and located more inferiorly (because of the smallest ANS-Ptm-Ve angle) in relation to the maxilla. Thus, the nasopharynx was narrower horizontally but longer vertically than in patients with platybasia. Conclusions: Cranial-base flexure influences the shape of the skull base and facial-skeletal structure and may alter the pharyngeal space between them. This finding should help improve preoperative planning regarding the effect of the pharyngeal flap height relative to the nasopharynx and oropharynx ratio that affects surgical outcomes, such as resonance and residual VPD. In patients with Class III malocclusion and maxillary constriction, careful planning of presurgical orthodontic treatment is needed in maxillary advancement procedures. Orthodontic and surgical collaboration can help prevent postoperative VPD, especially in platybasic patients.

What’s New in Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Management: An Update

Management of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction (VPD) Following Cleft Palate Repair: A Comprehensive Decision-Making Process Based on Severity and Structural Deficiencies

Demystifying Velopharyngeal Dysfunction for Plastic Surgery Trainees Part 3: Objective Assessment and Surgical Decision-Making

Demystifying Velopharyngeal Dysfunction for Plastic Surgery Trainees-Part 1: Anatomy and Physiology

Demystifying Velopharyngeal Dysfunction for Plastic Surgery Trainees Part 2: Speech Fundamentals and Perceptual Speech Assessment

Development of Postoperative Velopharyngeal Function in Patients with Cleft Palate.

Treatment Option for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Speech Aid

Management of Persistent Hypernasality After Pharyngeal Flap: A Novel V-to-Y Revision Procedure to Tighten the Lateral Ports

Update on using buccal myomucosal flaps for patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency: primary and secondary interventions

Prognostic Factors for Speech Outcome among Patients with Submucous Cleft Palate Managed by Furlow Palatoplasty or Posterior Pharyngeal Flap

Surgical Correction of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Cleft Palate Patients with Two Procedures of Reconstruction of Radical Intravelar Veloplasties (Ivvs)

[Investigation of the Optimized Surgical Procedure for the Cleft Palate Patients over Six Years Old].

The Square Flap Method for Cleft Palate Repair

Pattern of velopharyngeal valve closure in patients with cleft palate after primary cleft palate repair: A cross-sectional nasoendoscopic analysis

The impact of surgical technique and cleft width on the rate of secondary surgery and velopharyngeal function in children with UCLP at 5 years of age

[Effects of Speech Training on Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients with Cleft Palate].

Analysis of Velopharyngeal Morphology in Adults with Velopharyngeal Incompetence after Surgery of a Cleft Palate

Preoperative Velopharyngeal Morphology in Older Cleft Palate Patients with Postoperative Velopharyngeal Closure Versus Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.

Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Speech in Adult Patients with Repaired Cleft Palate.

Velopharyngeal function assessment in patients with cleft palate: perceptual speech assessment versus nasopharyngoscopy.

Differences in craniofacial morphology between platybasic and nonplatybasic patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction and control subjects