Abstract:Objective: In terms of health and social services, the territory of the province of Quebec is covered by four large 'integrated university health networks,' which are involved in the coordination of care delivery and medical training. The francophone components of the public mental health system for Montreal are thus primarily linked to the Integrated University Health Network of University of Montreal. In 2010, the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Montreal has included in its development strategy a firm commitment to the development and implementation of the 'patient partner expertise' in research, training and care in order to make this expertise no less than the brand of the Faculty. This commitment applies to all medical specialties that are taught at University of Montreal, including in psychiatry. More recently, the Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (IUSMM) has endorsed a new clinical vision that promotes full citizenship, which implies that service users and carers are considered as full partners with a specific expertise to be fully deployed. The objective of this paper is to examine, from an ethical point of view, the challenges that may be associated with involving such lay persons in various levels of mental health care planning and delivery, and in research. Methods: This study is mainly based on a review of the institutional processes that are in place at the IUSMM to promote service users' participation in care planning and delivery, and in research. The focus is on the practicalities and conditions for the exercise of such an active participation, as some questions and concerns emerged through a series of interviews with different stakeholders. These issues are addressed and discussed through the lenses of the ethical values that were formalized at IUSMM. Results: Despite a firm institutional commitment at IUSMM to implement its new citizenship-oriented clinical vision through greater service users' involvement, little is known about the possible negative impacts of their participation, on themselves and for regular employees. There is a consensus on the symbolic value of recognizing the potential of service users as contributors, as a peer workers or peer research assistants. This is an historic advance compared to a time when they were considered only as more or less passive recipients of services or as a simple research subjects. Some risk factors were nonetheless identified: isolation, emotional fatigue, possible relapse, insecurity, sometimes tensed relations with health or research professionals and misunderstanding. In organizational terms, among the pitfalls, the study highlighted the need for more cautious preparatory steps, guidance and support for service users and for professionals as well, and the importance of a global and integrated governance strategy. Conclusion: This study points to three main recommendations to better anticipate and manage possible risks associated with more or less improvised service users' active participation, as lay persons, in complex planning and service delivery and in research. The first would be directed towards professionals for them to reflect on the quality of the doctor-patient relationship in their facility as to see how service users can help to improve this relationship, but among a variety of stakeholders and without being the sole responsible for such an improvement, or for the lack of improvement thereof. The second recommendation would propose to draw an objective evaluative assessment of participatory approaches at the organizational level, promoting a real return of experience and in light of the issues raised by these practices. The third would recommend an update of the organizational ethical values when introducing practices that change the current paradigms of the provision of care and services and of research.

Future directions for patient engagement in research: a participatory workshop with Canadian patient partners and academic researchers

Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study

Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study

Patient Research Partner Engagement in OMERACT: Enhancing Engagement through the Implementation of Patient Engagement in Research Tools

Moving towards a more inclusive patient and public involvement in health research paradigm: the incorporation of a trauma-informed intersectional analysis

Patient, family member and caregiver engagement in shaping policy for primary health care teams in three Canadian Provinces

Establishing patient-partner priorities within the primary and integrated health care innovations network in Canada

Establishing Effective Patient Engagement Through a Terms of Reference to Foster Inclusivity and Empowerment in Research: Example From a Healthcare Transition Quality Indicators Project

Studying How Patient Engagement Influences Research: A Mixed Methods Study

Making the future together: Shaping autism research through meaningful participation

Engaging patients and citizens in digital health technology development through the virtual space

The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research

Public Engagement in Canadian Health Policy: Looking Back, Taking Stock and Charting the Future

Next-Generation Best Practices for Effective Collaboration in Health Research

[Issues, dilemmas and managerial strategies of potential ethical risks associated with the implementation of patient partnership practices in psychiatry: a case study]

Abstract TP111: Attitudes and Perceptions Regarding Patient Engagement and Knowledge Translation in Stroke Research: Results From the PERSPECT Qualitative Study

Patient engagement in research: lessons learned from CAPTURE ALS, a longitudinal observational ALS study

Patient engagement in type 2 diabetes mellitus research: what patients want

Engaging diverse patients in a diverse world: the development and preliminary evaluation of educational modules to support diversity in patient engagement research

Implementing Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute Stakeholder Engagement Principles in Models of Palliative Care Delivery and Advance Care Planning Research

Enhancing patient-oriented research training: participant perceptions of an online course