Abstract:Introduction Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a treatment modality for several diseases. Prediction of successful mobilization may be useful to optimize hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection. The objective was to identify characteristics that can influence the effectiveness of mobilization and create a model to predict the success of mobilization in candidates for ASCT. Methods This was a retrospective study, and data from patient candidates for ASCT between 09/2015 and 12/2021 were analyzed. Participants were assisted in five hospitals and laboratory procedures were performed at the Cell Processing Center (CPC) of Cetebio/Fundação Hemominas, Brazil. The medical records of the participants were reviewed to obtain the following information: gender, age, weight, diagnosis, mobilization, mobilization cycle, number of previous chemotherapy regimens and previous radiotherapy. The laboratory data analyzed were CD34+ cell enumeration and pre-collection peripheral blood (PB) blood count. Enumeration of CD34+ cell was performed using the ISHAGE protocol. The blood count was performed using an automated counter (SYSMEX XN-1000 AS-01). The studied outcome, good mobilization, was defined as a viable CD34+ cell count ≥ 20/uL in the PB. Model derivation was performed using logistic regression. The level of classification accuracy of model was tested in a subset of participants. Results The study population included 807 patients, 413 (51%) of whom were male. The median age was 54 (1-74) years. Multiple myeloma was the most common diagnosis (58,2%), followed by lymphoma. Of the 807 participants, 74 failed in previous mobilization attempts, totaling 881 cycles of mobilizations and collection attempts. Of the 623 participants, 353 were good mobilizers. Increasing patient weight, lower mean corpuscular volume (MCV), higher nucleated red blood cells (nRBC), peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and immature granulocyte count were significantly associated with good mobilization. In addition, participants diagnosed with multiple myeloma were two times more likely to be good mobilizers than patients with lymphoma (OR=1.92; 95%CI: 1.21 – 3.05; P=0.006). The model was applied to the validation set to identify patients who underwent apheresis (CD34+ cells count ≥ 10 μL), resulting in a sensibility of 69%, a specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 98%, a negative predictive value of 50%. Discussion The results of our study are extremely relevant to institutions that do not have a flow cytometer and rely on other institutions to define HSC collection by apheresis. Cetebio serves nine transplant centers. The centers that perform the collection of HSC are located between 40 to 568 km away from Cetebio (place of quantification of CD34+ cells). Predicting the outcome of mobilization may allow the adoption of complementary measures, such as the use of plerixafor. Furthermore, it would better optimize the collection of CPH by apheresis. Thus, it would be possible to avoid additional collection days, reducing costs and risks related to administration of additional doses of G-CSF, catheter maintenance and prolonged hospital stay. Conclusion Success in mobilization was greater in participants who underwent the first mobilization cycle and who had a diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Furthermore, higher weight and levels of nRBC, immature granulocytes, and PBMC, as well as lower levels of MCV, were associated with successful mobilization.

Predictive factors for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies: A single‐center experience

A Retrospective Study of Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization by G-CSF in Combination with Chemotherapy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma.

Chemotherapy Combined With Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-Csf) For Mobilization Of Cd34(+) Cells In Lymphoma And Multiple Myeloma Patients

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Stem Cell Mobilization Failure in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Impact of Clinical Parameters and Induction Regimens on Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients

The More, the Less: Age and Chemotherapy Load Are Predictive of Poor Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

The Efficacy of Residual Plerixafor for Second-Day Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Clinical analysis of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimen in 56 multiple myeloma patients

Mobilization strategies with and without plerixafor for autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma

Pre-mobilization Platelet Count Predicts Stem Cell Yield During Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

A German-Wide Systematic Study on Mobilization and Collection of Hematopoietic Stem Cells in Poor Mobilizer Patients with Multiple Myeloma prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Predictive value of peripheral blood CD34-positive cell count for the stem cell mobilization effect of plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma

Predictive Modeling of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization and Collection Based on Peripheral Blood Marker

Predictive model of the efficiency of hematopoietic stem cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma based on multiple peripheral blood markers

Does immunohistochemical staining predict mobilization success in multiple myeloma patients?

The Impact of CD34+ Cell Collection Yields for Autologous Transplant on Survival Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma

A Retrospective Analysis of Autologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilizations and Collections in 109 Multiple Myeloma Patients

The effect of plerixafor on autologous stem cell mobilization, cell viability, and apheresis challenges

[Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide Combined with Cyclophosphamide for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma]

Chinese experience in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection in lymphoma patients: a retrospective cohort study

EVALUATION OF BLOOD CELL COUNT USING THE SYSMEX XN-1000 AUTOMATIC HEMATOLOGY ANALYZER TO OPTIMIZE COLLECTION OF PERIPHERAL BLOOD PROGENITOR CELLS BY LEUKAPHERESIS