Perinatal outcomes following abdominoplasty: a retrospective study and review of current literature
CeCe Cheng,Scott A Martin,Jaime A Perez,Melissa I March
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101331
Abstract:Background: Abdominoplasty surgery is a common body contouring surgery to remove excess fat and skin and restore weakened or separated abdominal muscles caused by aging, pregnancy, or weight fluctuations. There is limited literature regarding patient and pregnancy outcomes after abdominoplasty. Objective: This study aimed to determine whether there was a correlation between adverse pregnancy outcomes and history of abdominoplasty. Study design: Our study used a large federated deidentified national health research network with data sourced from 68 healthcare organizations within the United States (TriNetX; data accessed on August 19, 2022). All patients with a record of pregnancy were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and Tenth Revision, codes and were grouped into those with a history of abdominoplasty and those without. This study evaluated the perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery Dopplers, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, gestational diabetes mellitus, macrosomia, stillbirth, abnormal placentation, and wound disruption or infection occurring during a patient's pregnancy after abdominoplasty. Propensity matching was performed to account for potential confounders. An alpha level of <.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Of the 44,737 patients meeting our criteria, 304 had a history of abdominoplasty, whereas 44,433 did not (control). Our study found that patients with a history of abdominoplasty had significantly higher gravidity, were largely located in the Southern and Midwest region, and had higher counts of vaginal deliveries and cesarean deliveries than the control cohort (Table 1). After propensity score matching, our study found a lower risk of preeclampsia and preterm premature rupture of membranes in patients with abdominoplasty (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.67; P<.0001) (Table 2). Furthermore, abdominoplasty was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.13; P=.0002) (Table 2). Lastly, this study did not find significant differences in the other perinatal outcomes (Table 2). Conclusion: Our data suggest that abdominoplasty may be associated with a relative increase in the rates of preterm delivery and cesarean delivery and that other perinatal outcomes are not increased. This provides evidence that future desire for pregnancy need not be a relative contraindication to abdominoplasty.