Abstract:Accurately predicting grapevine yield and quality is critical for optimising vineyard management and ensuring economic viability. Numerous studies have reported the complexity in modelling grapevine yield and quality due to variability in the canopy structure, challenges in incorporating soil and microclimatic factors, and management practices throughout the growing season. The use of multimodal data and machine learning (ML) algorithms could overcome these challenges. Our study aimed to assess the potential of multimodal data (hyperspectral vegetation indices (VIs), thermal indices, and canopy state variables) and ML algorithms to predict grapevine yield components and berry composition parameters. The study was conducted during the 2019/20 and 2020/21 grapevine growing seasons in two South Australian vineyards. Hyperspectral and thermal data of the canopy were collected at several growth stages. Simultaneously, grapevine canopy state variables, including the fractional intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (fiPAR), stem water potential (Ψstem), leaf chlorophyll content (LCC), and leaf gas exchange, were collected. Yield components were recorded at harvest. Berry composition parameters, such as total soluble solids (TSSs), titratable acidity (TA), pH, and the maturation index (IMAD), were measured at harvest. A total of 24 hyperspectral VIs and 3 thermal indices were derived from the proximal hyperspectral and thermal data. These data, together with the canopy state variable data, were then used as inputs for the modelling. Both linear and non-linear regression models, such as ridge (RR), Bayesian ridge (BRR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), and decision trees (DTs), were employed to model grape yield components and berry composition parameters. The results indicated that the GB model consistently outperformed the other models. The GB model had the best performance for the total number of clusters per vine (R2 = 0.77; RMSE = 0.56), average cluster weight (R2 = 0.93; RMSE = 0.00), average berry weight (R2 = 0.95; RMSE = 0.00), cluster weight (R2 = 0.95; RMSE = 0.13), and average berries per bunch (R2 = 0.93; RMSE = 0.83). For the yield, the RF model performed the best (R2 = 0.97; RMSE = 0.55). The GB model performed the best for the TSSs (R2 = 0.83; RMSE = 0.34), pH (R2 = 0.93; RMSE = 0.02), and IMAD (R2 = 0.88; RMSE = 0.19). However, the RF model performed best for the TA (R2 = 0.83; RMSE = 0.33). Our results also revealed the top 10 predictor variables for grapevine yield components and quality parameters, namely, the canopy temperature depression, LCC, fiPAR, normalised difference infrared index, Ψstem, stomatal conductance (gs), net photosynthesis (Pn), modified triangular vegetation index, modified red-edge simple ratio, and ANTgitelson index. These predictors significantly influence the grapevine growth, berry quality, and yield. The identification of these predictors of the grapevine yield and fruit composition can assist growers in improving vineyard management decisions and ultimately increase profitability.

A diel multi-tissue genome-scale metabolic model of Vitis vinifera

A diel multi-tissue genome-scale metabolic model of

Transcriptomic and metabolomic integration as a resource in grapevine to study fruit metabolite quality traits

Applicability of metabolomics to improve sustainable grapevine production

GrapevineXL reliably predicts multi-annual dynamics of vine water status, berry growth, and sugar accumulation in vineyards

Wine metabolome and sensory analyses demonstrate the oenological potential of novel grapevine genotypes for sustainable viticulture in warm climates

Curation and Analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome-Scale Metabolic Model for Predicting Production of Sensory Impact Molecules under Enological Conditions

Constructing Integrated Networks for Identifying New Secondary Metabolic Pathway Regulators in Grapevine: Recent Applications and Future Opportunities

Genomic sequencing, genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction, and in silico flux analysis of the grape endophytic fungus Alternaria sp. MG1

Integrating metabolomics and targeted gene expression to uncover potential biomarkers of fungal/oomycetes-associated disease susceptibility in grapevine

The single-berry metabolomic clock paradigm reveals new stages and metabolic switches during grapevine berry development

Aggregated gene co-expression networks predict transcription factor regulatory landscapes in grapevine

Genetic diversity and population structure assessed by SSR and SNP markers in a large germplasm collection of grape

End-to-end multimodal 3D imaging and machine learning workflow for non-destructive phenotyping of grapevine trunk internal structure

Development of a genome-scale metabolic model for the lager hybrid yeast S. pastorianus to understand the evolution of metabolic pathways in industrial settings

Grape and Wine Metabolomics to Develop New Insights Using Untargeted and Targeted Approaches

Integrating Hyperspectral, Thermal, and Ground Data with Machine Learning Algorithms Enhances the Prediction of Grapevine Yield and Berry Composition

Training grapevines generates a metabolomic signature of wine

A functional-structural plant model that simulates whole- canopy gas exchange of grapevine plants (Vitis vinifera L.) under different training systems

Model-Driven Elucidation of Lactose and Galactose Metabolism via Oxidoreductive Pathway in Sungouiella intermedia for Cell Factory Applications

Coupling kinetic expressions and metabolic networks for predicting wine fermentations