Abstract:As service robots become increasingly autonomous and follow their own task-related goals, human-robot conflicts seem inevitable, especially in shared spaces. Goal conflicts can arise from simple trajectory planning to complex task prioritization. For successful human-robot goal-conflict resolution, humans and robots need to negotiate their goals and priorities. For this, the robot might be equipped with effective conflict resolution strategies to be assertive and effective but similarly accepted by the user. In this paper, conflict resolution strategies for service robots (public cleaning robot, home assistant robot) are developed by transferring psychological concepts (e.g., negotiation, cooperation) to HRI. Altogether, fifteen strategies were grouped by the expected affective outcome (positive, neutral, negative). In two online experiments, the acceptability of and compliance with these conflict resolution strategies were tested with humanoid and mechanic robots in two application contexts (public: n 1 = 61; private: n 2 = 93). To obtain a comparative value, the strategies were also applied by a human. As additional outcomes trust, fear, arousal, and valence, as well as perceived politeness of the agent were assessed. The positive/neutral strategies were found to be more acceptable and effective than negative strategies. Some negative strategies (i.e., threat, command) even led to reactance and fear. Some strategies were only positively evaluated and effective for certain agents (human or robot) or only acceptable in one of the two application contexts (i.e., approach, empathy). Influences on strategy acceptance and compliance in the public context could be found: acceptance was predicted by politeness and trust. Compliance was predicted by interpersonal power. Taken together, psychological conflict resolution strategies can be applied in HRI to enhance robot task effectiveness. If applied robot-specifically and context-sensitively they are accepted by the user. The contribution of this paper is twofold: conflict resolution strategies based on Human Factors and Social Psychology are introduced and empirically evaluated in two online studies for two application contexts. Influencing factors and requirements for the acceptance and effectiveness of robot assertiveness are discussed.

Interaction strategy for robotic apology based on human orientation toward service

Human-robot Negotiation of Intentions Based on Virtual Fixtures for Shared Task Execution

What Makes An Apology More Effective? Exploring Anthropomorphism, Individual Differences, And Emotion In Human-Automation Trust Repair

Multi-Robot Behavior Adaptation to Humans' Intention in Human-Robot Interaction Using Information-Driven Fuzzy Friend-Q Learning.

Adapting Multi-Robot Behavior to Communication Atmosphere in Humans-Robots Interaction Using Fuzzy Production Rule Based Friend-Q Learning

Having Different Dialog Roles in Telecommunication by Using Two Teleoperated Robots Reduces an Operator's Guilt

Improving the closing sequences of interaction between human and robot through conversation analysis

Development and Testing of Psychological Conflict Resolution Strategies for Assertive Robots to Resolve Human-Robot Goal Conflict

Technical Challenges for Smooth Interaction With Seniors With Dementia: Lessons From Humanitude™

Step Aside! VR-Based Evaluation of Adaptive Robot Conflict Resolution Strategies for Domestic Service Robots

Multiparty conversation via multirobot system: incorporation of nonverbal user responses for continued conversation

Improving User's Sense of Participation in Robot-Driven Dialogue

Agreebot introduction dialogue in human–robot interaction: improving the acceptability of robot statements on incapable robotic experiences

Asymmetric communication: cognitive models of humans toward an android robot

Implementation of Engagement Detection for Human–Robot Interaction in Complex Environments

Behavioral assessment of a humanoid robot when attracting pedestrians in a mall

Appreciation vs. apology: Research on the influence mechanism of chatbot service recovery based on politeness theory

Human Reactions to Incorrect Answers from Robots

To Err Is Robot: How Humans Assess and Act toward an Erroneous Social Robot

Acceptable dialogue robot with a side participant robot for group recommendation

Improving of Robotic Virtual Agent's errors that are accepted by reaction and human's preference