Indications for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided biliary intervention: Does EUS always come after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?

Yousuke Nakai,Hiroyuki Isayama,Natsuyo Yamamoto,Saburo Matsubara,Hirofumi Kogure,Suguru Mizuno,Tsuyoshi Hamada,Naminatsu Takahara,Rie Uchino,Dai Akiyama,Kaoru Takagi,Takeo Watanabe,Gyotane Umefune,Kazunaga Ishigaki,Minoru Tada,Kazuhiko Koike
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12752
2016-11-10
Digestive Endoscopy
Abstract:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD), first reported as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), is increasingly reported as a primary procedure without failed ERCP. The present study aims to evaluate the outcomes of therapeutic biliary ERCP and to compare the safety and effectiveness of primary EUS-BD with those of ERCP, rescue EUS-BD and PTBD.METHODS: We retrospectively studied therapeutic biliary ERCP as well as subsequent rescue PTBD and EUS-BD. Additionally, indications, safety and technical success of primary EUS-BD were evaluated.RESULTS: Between August 2013 and September 2015, a total of 520 therapeutic biliary ERCP with a native papilla were analyzed. We encountered 23 cases with inaccessible papilla and 22 cases with failed cannulation, which were rescued by 21 PTBD, 16 EUS-BD and two repeat ERCP. Additionally, 40 primary EUS-BD were carried out during the same period as a result of 10 recurrent cholangitis cases after transpapillary drainage, five outside failed cannulation, four altered anatomy, two history of ERCP-related adverse events (AE), two technical difficulties in stenting under enteroscopy-assisted ERCP and 17 on study protocol. Technical success and AE rates were 95.6% and 14.5% in ERCP, 90.5% and 33.3% in rescue PTBD, 93.8% and 18.8% in rescue EUS-BD, and 95.0% and 22.5% in primary EUS-BD, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Rescue EUS-BD was used in 3.1% among all ERCP. Given the comparable technical success and AE rates of both primary and rescue EUS-BD, primary EUS-BD without failed ERCP can be a treatment option if it provides advantages over ERCP.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?