Abstract:For many cancer sites it is necessary to assess risks from low-dose exposures via extrapolation from groups exposed at moderate and high levels of dose. Measurement error can substantially alter the shape of this relationship and hence the derived population risk estimates. Even in studies with direct measurement of low-dose exposures measurement error could be substantial in relation to the size of the dose estimates and thereby distort population risk estimates. Recently, much attention has been devoted to the issue of shared errors, common in many datasets, and particularly important in occupational settings. In this paper we test a Bayesian model averaging method, the so-called Bayesian two-dimensional Monte Carlo (2DMC) method, that has been fairly recently proposed against a very newly proposed modification of the regression calibration method, which is particularly suited to studies in which there is a substantial amount of shared error, and in which there may also be curvature in the true dose response. We also compared both methods against standard regression calibration and Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. The Bayesian 2DMC method performs poorly, with coverage probabilities both for the linear and quadratic dose coefficients that are under 5%, particularly when the magnitudes of classical and Berkson error are both moderate to large (20%-50%). The method also produces substantially biased (by a factor of 10) estimates of both the linear and quadratic coefficients, with the linear coefficient overestimated and the quadratic coefficient underestimated. By comparison the extended regression calibration method yields coverage probabilities that are too low when shared and unshared Berkson errors are both large (50%), although otherwise it performs well, and coverage is generally better than the Bayesian 2DMC and all other methods. The bias of the predicted relative risk at a variety of doses is generally smallest for extended regression calibration, and largest for the Bayesian 2DMC method (apart from unadjusted regression), with standard regression calibration and Monte Carlo maximum likelihood exhibiting bias in predicted relative risk generally somewhat intermediate between the other two methods.

Mortality Rate Estimation and Standardization for Public Reporting: Medicare's Hospital Compare

A Bayesian hierarchical small-area population model accounting for data source specific methodologies from American Community Survey, Population Estimates Program, and Decennial Census data

Evaluating federal policies using Bayesian time series models: estimating the causal impact of the hospital readmissions reduction program

Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Women with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Machine Learning Approach

Estimating County-Level Mortality Rates Using Highly Censored Data From CDC WONDER

Bayesian variable selection using cost-adjusted BIC, with application to cost-effective measurement of quality of health care

Generalizability challenges of mortality risk prediction models: A retrospective analysis on a multi-center database

Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The ENT Example

Measuring performance for end-of-life care

Bayesian model averaging for mortality forecasting using leave-future-out validation

Patient Safety in Hospitals - a Bayesian Analysis of Unobservable Hospital and Specialty Level Risk Factors.

A generalisation of the method of regression calibration and comparison with Bayesian and frequentist model averaging methods

Can we trust the standardized mortality ratio? A formal analysis and evaluation based on axiomatic requirements

Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The Diabetes and Endocrinology Example

Assessing Hospital Performance After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Big Data

Hospital quality risk standardization via approximate balancing weights

A generalisation of the method of regression calibration and comparison with the Bayesian 2-dimensional Monte Carlo method

Incorporating Acute Conditions into Risk-Adjustment for Provider Profiling: The Case of the US News and World Report Best Hospitals Rankings Methodology

A Bayesian approach to the global estimation of maternal mortality

A Review of Modeling Methods for Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Patients in Intensive Care Unit