Abstract:Cities, which are the primary economic engine and emission source in China, accounted for 70% of the country’s total energy-related CO 2 emissions in 2010. The development of low-carbon cities has become the first priority of policymakers. Low-carbon cities enhance competition in the long run but also inevitably impose costs in the short term. To investigate the associated abatement costs of CO 2 toward low-carbon cities, we apply the directional distance function on panel data covering 104 Chinese prefecture-level and above cities from 2001 to 2014. Our results show that, on average, the cost to control one ton of CO 2 is 1070 CNY, or equivalent to 129 US $. This cost shows great individual heterogeneity and time variation; the year 2011 witnesses a significant reversal of the marginal abatement cost of CO 2 . It is because China begins implementing a mandatory CO 2 intensity reduction target for the 12th Five-Year Plan (FYP). We establish a four-quadrant matrix framework to identify low-carbon cities and track the low-carbon transition path based on emission indicators (total emissions, per capita emissions, and emission intensity) and abatement cost pairs. Among the four types of emission-cost patterns, more cities are scattered in the "low emission-level and high abatement-cost" quadrant, and eight cities are clarified as low-carbon cities in 2014. In terms of per capita emissions and abatement costs, the “high-per-capita-emission and low-abatement-cost” club include five cities in 2001, while this number rises to seven members in 2014. Most cities are also located in the “low-emission-intensity and low-abatement-cost” zone when the relationship between CO 2 intensity and abatement cost is considered. Our results call for policymakers' attention to hot spots and emission-based, per capita emission-based, or intensity-based city-level decarbonizing policies.

Climate-Smart City: Can China's Smart City Policy Lead to Low-Carbon Development of Cities?

Carbon Emission Reduction Effects of the Smart City Pilot Policy in China

Urban governance and sustainable development: The effect of smart city on carbon emission in China

Has the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy Reduced Urban Carbon Emissions in China?

Is smart city low-carbon? Evidence from China

Smarter and Cleaner? The Carbon Reduction Effect of Smart Cities: A Perspective on Green Technology Progress

A significance of smart city pilot policies in China for enhancing carbon emission efficiency in construction

Does Smart City Construction Decrease Urban Carbon Emission Intensity? Evidence from a Difference-in-Difference Estimation in China

Evaluating the Impact of Smart City Policy on Carbon Emission Efficiency

Can Smart City Policy Facilitate the Low-Carbon Economy in China? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Pilot City

Decarbonizing China’s Cities with the Lowest Cost

Effect of smart city construction on an urban transition to a low-carbon economy: evidence from China

Can Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies Reduce Environmental Pollution? Evidence From Prefecture-Level Data in China

Innovation city and low-carbon future: a quasinatural experiment from China

The impacts of smart city construction on carbon total factor productivity: empirical evidence from China

The effectiveness of smart city policy on pollution reduction in China: new evidence from a quasi-natural experiment

The impact of China’s low-carbon city pilot policy on carbon emissions: based on the multi-period DID model

Can low-carbon city pilot policies improve urban energy efficiency? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

How does the low-carbon city pilot policy affect the synergistic governance efficiency of carbon and smog? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Smart City, Digitalization and CO2 Emissions: Evidence from 353 Cities in China

Do Urban Innovation Policies Reduce Carbon Emission? Empirical Evidence from Chinese Cities with DID