Abstract:Background: Health systems had to rapidly implement infection control strategies to sustain their workforces during the COVID-19 pandemic. Various outbreak response tools, such as digital contact tracing (DCT), have been developed to monitor exposures and symptoms of health care workers (HCWs). Limited research evidence exists on the experiences with these technologies and the impacts of DCT innovations from the perspective of stakeholders in health care environments. Objective: This study aims to identify the factors influencing the adoption of DCT, highlight variations in perspectives across 3 key stakeholder groups concerning the impact of DCT, and provide benchmarking evidence for future pandemic preparedness. Methods: Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study to investigate the implementation and impact of DCT at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario between December 2022 and April 2023. We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with key stakeholders, including health care administrators (6/21, 29%), occupational health and safety specialists (8/21, 38%), and HCWs (7/21, 33%). Stakeholders were asked about the factors influencing engagement with the DCT tool, organizational-level uptake, the implementation process, long-term use and sustainability of DCT, and unintended consequences. Verbatim transcripts were subject to thematic analysis using NVivo (QSR International). Results: The implementation of DCT was viable and well received. End users indicated that their engagement with the DCT tool was facilitated by its perceived ease of use and the ability to gain awareness of probable COVID-19 exposures; however, risk assessment consequences and access concerns were reported as barriers ( reach ). Participants commonly agreed that the DCT technology had a positive influence on the hospital's capacity to meet the demands of COVID-19 ( effectiveness ). Implementors and occupational specialists referred to negative staffing impacts and the loss of nuanced information as unintended consequences ( effectiveness ). Safety-focused communication strategies and having a DCT tool that was human-centered were crucial factors driving staff adoption of the technology. Conversely, adoption was challenged by the misaligned delivery of the DCT tool with HCWs' standard practices, alongside the evolving perceived threat of COVID-19. Stakeholders collectively agreed on the viability of DCT and its applicability to infectious disease practices ( maintenance ). Conclusions: Hospital stakeholders were highly satisfied with DCT technology and it was perceived as feasible, efficient, and having a positive impact on organizational safety. Challenges related to the alignment and delivery of DCT, alongside the evolving perspectives on COVID-19, posed obstacles to continued adoption by HCWs. Our findings contribute to evidence-based practices and present benchmarks that can inform preparedness for future pandemics and infectious disease outbreaks and help other organizations implement similar technologies.

Lessons Learned from the Launch and Implementation of the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Program in New York City: a Qualitative Study

Evaluation of the New York City COVID-19 case investigation and contact tracing program: a cascade of care analysis

Meeting Social Needs in a Crisis Context: Lessons Learned from Integrating the 'Take Care Initiative' into New York City's Testing and Contact Tracing Program

Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Contact Tracing During a Public Health Emergency: A Prospective Implementation Study

Experience of Public Health Departments in Implementation of COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Programs

Implementation of a volunteer contact tracing program for COVID-19 in the United States: A qualitative focus group study

Community-Based Workforce for COVID-19 Contact Tracing and Prevention Activities in New York City, July-December 2020

Exploring the needs and experiences of contact tracing staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ireland

Evaluating completion rates of COVID-19 contact tracing surveys in New York City

Scale-Up of COVID-19 Testing Services in NYC, 2020–2021: Lessons Learned to Maximize Reach, Equity and Timeliness

Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Posts Related to a COVID-19 Test & Trace Program in NYC

‘We are not here to enforce; we are here for the people’ Factors influencing performance of contact tracing during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

Employee investigation and contact tracing program in a pediatric cancer hospital to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 among the workforce, patients, and caregivers

Digital Contact Tracing Implementation Among Leaders and Health Care Workers in a Pediatric Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Interview Study

Centering Health Equity Within COVID-19 Contact Tracing: Connecticut's Community Outreach Specialist Program

Impact of a University-Led COVID-19 Case Investigation and Contact Tracing Program

Exploring the psychological impact of contact tracing work on staff during the COVID-19 pandemic

Testing Communication Concepts on COVID-19 Contact Tracing among Black and Latinx/Hispanic People in the United States

Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence

Contact tracing in Austria, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Ukraine, and Kosovo during the COVID-19 pandemic: response review and good practices

Combatting SARS-CoV-2 With Digital Contact Tracing and Notification: Navigating Six Points of Failure