Strong Impacts of Legitimate Open Burning on Brown Carbon Aerosol in Northeast China

Yuan Cheng,Qin-qin Yu,Xu-bing Cao,Cai-qing Yan,Ying-jie Zhong,Zhen-yu Du,Lin-lin Liang,Wan-li Ma,Hong Qi,Mei Zheng,Jiu-meng Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00352

2021-06-07

Abstract:The massive agricultural sector in Northeast China results in a huge amount of crop residues, which have long been disposed mainly through "illegal" open burning. A transition of local policy occurred in 2018, with a window of approximately 3 months issued for agricultural fires. Here, we investigated the responses of brown carbon (BrC) to the new policy. Persistently high levels of BrC mass (estimated as methanol-soluble organic carbon) and absorption coefficient were observed during the "legitimate burning" period. Agricultural fires, the major driver responsible for the elevated BrC levels, were found to be distinctive with relatively low combustion efficiencies and resulted in BrC with less light absorptivity, compared to residential burning of crop residues. The agricultural fire emissions also led to overestimation of elemental carbon (EC) mass, by a factor of up to 1.6. This in turn resulted in substantial underestimation of <i>f</i>_BrC/EC, the fraction of solar energy absorbed by BrC relative to EC. This study indicates that the new open burning policy could not be considered successful with respect to either air quality improvement or climate change mitigation.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00352?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00352</a>.Field observation, PMF analysis, calculation of <i>f</i>_BrC/EC, and additional discussion on EC measurement uncertainties; relationship between MSOC and OC_refined (Figure S1); factor profiles resolved by PMF (Figure S2); temporal variations of (<i>b</i>_abs)₃₆₅, MSOC, and levoglucosan (Figure S3); dependence of (<i>b</i>_abs)₃₆₅ on MSOC (Figure S4); statistical results of MSOC and (<i>b</i>_abs)₃₆₅ for Cases A–C (Figure S5); contributions of various sources to MSOC for Cases A–C (Figure S6); representative fire count results for Cases A–C (Figure S7); dependences of EC_refined on CO for Cases A–C (Figure S8); AAE for Cases A–C (Figure S9); (<i>b</i>_abs)₃₆₅ source apportionment results for Cases A–C (Figure S10); comparisons of EC_refined and EC_raw for Cases A–C (Figure S11); <i>f</i>_BrC/EC results for 300–700 and 300–2500 nm (Figure S12); levoglucosan vs Cl^– relationships and levoglucosan vs SO₂ relationships for Cases A–C (Figure S13); comparisons of EC_NIOSH and EC_IMPROVE-A for Cases A–C (Figure S14); and tables summarizing observational results (Tables S1–S3) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00352/suppl_file/ez1c00352_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

environmental sciences,engineering, environmental