Brainstem neuronal responses to transcutaneous auricular and cervical vagus nerve stimulation in rats

Misty M. Owens,Vincent Jacquemet,Vitaly Napadow,Nicole Lewis,Eric Beaumont
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp286680
2024-07-20
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend Vagus nerve stimulation was conducted through transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) administered at the cymba concha of the ear to activate the auricular branch ofthe vagus nerve (ABVN) and through cervical vagus nerve stimulation (cVNS) administered at the neck to activate the main cervical branch of the vagus. Vagus nerve stimulation was administered at 20 Hz and 100 Hz using a standard stimulation pattern and also at 250 Hz using a bursting stimulation pattern. Individual neurons were recorded within the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) or the spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5). Neurons displaying decreases inactivity (negative responders) or increases in activity (positive responders) were observed. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) targets subcutaneous axons in the auricular branch of the vagus nerve at the outer ear. Its non‐invasive nature makes it a potential treatment for various disorders. taVNS induces neuromodulatory effects within the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS), and due to its widespread connectivity, the NTS acts as a gateway to elicit neuromodulation in both higher‐order brain regions and other brainstem nuclei (e.g. spinal trigeminal nucleus; Sp5). Our objective was to examine stimulation parameters on single‐neuron electrophysiological responses in α‐chloralose‐anaesthetized Sprague–Dawley rats within NTS and Sp5. taVNS was also compared to traditional cervical VNS (cVNS) on single neuronal activation. Specifically, electrophysiological extracellular recordings were evaluated for a range of frequency and intensity parameters (20–250 Hz, 0.5–1.0 mA). Neurons were classified as positive, negative or non‐responders based on increased activity, decreased activity or no response during stimulation, respectively. Frequency‐dependent analysis showed that 20 and 100 Hz generated the highest proportion of positive responders in NTS and Sp5 with 1.0 mA intensities eliciting the greatest magnitude of response. Comparisons between taVNS and cVNS revealed similar parameter‐specific activation for caudal NTS neuronal populations; however, individual neurons showed different activation profiles. The latter suggests that cVNS and taVNS send afferent input to NTS via different neuronal pathways. This study demonstrates differential parameter‐specific taVNS responses and begins an investigation of the mechanisms responsible for taVNS modulation. Understanding the neuronal pathways responsible for eliciting neuromodulatory effects will enable more tailored taVNS treatments in various clinical disorders. Key points Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) offers a non‐invasive alternative to invasive cervical vagus nerve stimulation (cVNS) by activating vagal afferents in the ear to induce neuromodulation. Our study evaluated taVNS effects on neuronal firing patterns in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) and spinal trigeminal nucleus (Sp5) and found that 20 and 100 Hz notably increased neuronal activity during stimulation in both nuclei. Increasing taVNS intensity not only increased the number of neurons responding in Sp5 but also increased the magnitude of response, suggesting a heightened sensitivity to taVNS compared to NTS. Comparisons between cVNS and taVNS revealed similar overall activation but different responses on individual neurons, indicating distinct neural pathways. These results show parameter‐specific and nuclei‐specific responses to taVNS and confirm that taVNS can elicit responses comparable to cVNS at the neuronal level, but it does so through different neuronal pathways.
neurosciences,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?