Abstract:It is commonly assumed that a person’s emotional state can be readily inferred from his or her facial movements, typically called emotional expressions or facial expressions. This assumption influences legal judgments, policy decisions, national security protocols, and educational practices; guides the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illness, as well as the development of commercial applications; and pervades everyday social interactions as well as research in other scientific fields such as artificial intelligence, neuroscience, and computer vision. In this article, we survey examples of this widespread assumption, which we refer to as the common view, and we then examine the scientific evidence that tests this view, focusing on the six most popular emotion categories used by consumers of emotion research: anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. The available scientific evidence suggests that people do sometimes smile when happy, frown when sad, scowl when angry, and so on, as proposed by the common view, more than what would be expected by chance. Yet how people communicate anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise varies substantially across cultures, situations, and even across people within a single situation. Furthermore, similar configurations of facial movements variably express instances of more than one emotion category. In fact, a given configuration of facial movements, such as a scowl, often communicates something other than an emotional state. Scientists agree that facial movements convey a range of information and are important for social communication, emotional or otherwise. But our review suggests an urgent need for research that examines how people actually move their faces to express emotions and other social information in the variety of contexts that make up everyday life, as well as careful study of the mechanisms by which people perceive instances of emotion in one another. We make specific research recommendations that will yield a more valid picture of how people move their faces to express emotions and how they infer emotional meaning from facial movements in situations of everyday life. This research is crucial to provide consumers of emotion research with the translational information they require.

Facial expressions elicit multiplexed perceptions of emotion categories and dimensions

Facial expressions dynamically cascade emotion category and intensity information over time

Culturally diverse facial expression signals diminish the precision of emotion communication across cultures

Cultural facial expressions dynamically convey emotion category and intensity information

Compound facial expressions of emotion

Mapping the Passions: Toward a High-Dimensional Taxonomy of Emotional Experience and Expression

Smile through your fear and sadness: transmitting and identifying facial expression signals over a range of viewing distances

Deep learning reveals what facial expressions mean to people in different cultures

Emotional Expressions Reconsidered: Challenges to Inferring Emotion From Human Facial Movements

Facial expression recognition: A meta-analytic review of theoretical models and neuroimaging evidence

Multimodal Emotion Recognition by Combining Physiological Signals and Facial Expressions: a Preliminary Study.

Research On Multiple Facial Expressions Of Emotions

Dynamic Facial Expression of Emotion Made Easy

Spatiotemporal structure and substates in facial expressions and speech movements

Expression perceptive fields explain individual differences in the recognition of facial emotions

Cross-Cultural and Cultural-Specific Production and Perception of Facial Expressions of Emotion in the Wild

How emotion is experienced and expressed in multiple cultures: a large-scale experiment across North America, Europe, and Japan

Different Roles Of Foveal And Extrafoveal Vision In Ensemble Representation For Facial Expressions

Facial Expression Enhances Emotion Perception Compared to Vocal Prosody: Behavioral and Fmri Studies

Distributing expressional faces in 2-D emotional space

Beyond Facial Expression: Spatial Distance as a Factor in the Communication of Discrete Emotions