Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics

W. Nordhaus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/AER.109.6.1991

2019-06-01

Abstract:William D. Nordhaus delivered his Prize Lecture on 8 December 2018 at the Aula Magna, Stockholm University.

Economics,Environmental Science

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Climate Change, Carbon Neutrality: the Role of Spatial Economics

Jian Wang,Xiwei Zhu,Yong Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-024-01294-x

2024-01-01

The Annals of Regional Science

Abstract:The collection of papers in this special issue examines empirical evidence from Asia, Europe, and North America, analyzes how climate change affects the spatial economy, and explores the feasibility of carbon neutrality as a countermeasure to climate change. It begins by discussing the research background, the motivation for emphasizing spatial considerations, and the analysis in climate change studies. Each accepted paper is then elaborated upon regarding topic selection, methodology, and findings. The issue highlights the crucial role of spatial elements in climate studies and aims to inspire further research in this direction. By leveraging regional science and analytical tools, the goal is to develop more effective and equitable policies for carbon abatement.
The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World

Martin L. Weitzman,William Nordhaus,Gernot Wagner

Abstract:William Nordhaus’s Climate Casino and Gernot Wagner and Martin L. Weitzman’s Climate Shock are two outstanding pieces of economic analysis that powerfully call for citizens and world leaders to take action on climate change. Both books address three overriding questions: first, they explain why climate change is a pressing issue for the international community; second, they discuss when environmental interventions should be pursued; third, they prescribe suggestions for what those interventions should be. The two works share a common perspective in their The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World William Nordhaus (Yale University Press, 392 pp., $20.00) Climate Shock: The Economic Consequences of a Hotter Planet Gernot Wagner & Martin L. Weitzman (Princeton University Press, 264 pp., $27.95)

Economics,Environmental Science
Form Indifference to Difference——Remarks on the Contribution of 2008 Nobel Laureate in Economics

Wu Yiyun,Zhu Xiwei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14167/j.zjss.2008.11.014

2008-01-01

Abstract:American economist Paul Krugman won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Economics for his analysis of trade patterns and location of economic activity.Reviewing the basic concepts and formulation of Krugman's theories on international trade and economic geography,this paper concludes his contribution to modern economics.
Feedback, Dynamics, and Optimal Control in Climate Economics

Christopher M. Kellett,Steven R. Weller,Timm Faulwasser,Lars Grüne,Willi Semmler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1812.08066

2019-03-19

Abstract:For his work in the economics of climate change, Professor William Nordhaus was a co-recipient of the 2018 Nobel Memorial Prize for Economic Sciences. A core component of the work undertaken by Nordhaus is the Dynamic Integrated model of Climate and Economy, known as the DICE model. The DICE model is a discrete-time model with two control inputs and is primarily used in conjunction with a particular optimal control problem in order to estimate optimal pathways for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, we provide a tutorial introduction to the DICE model and we indicate challenges and open problems of potential interest for the systems and control community.

Systems and Control,Optimization and Control
William D. Nordhaus Managing the Commons: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 1994, ISBN 0-262-140551-1

R. Costanza

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X00000735

1996-07-01

Environment and Development Economics

Abstract:William Nordhaus has gone further than any economist to date at building a dynamic integrated model of the world’s climate and economic systems, with some one-way linkages to agricultural systems and ecosystems. Managing the Commons is an admirably readable description of this effort which, in his words, ‘balances the costs of emissions controls in energy policies and other areas against the impacts to agriculture, coastlines, and ecosystem values’. In addition to a detailed description of the Dynamic Integrated Climate and the Economy (DICE) model and several scenarios produced by the model, the book includes large sections on sensitivity analysis of the model’s parameter uncertainty and an analysis of the value of information gained at various times in the future to the decision process.

Economics,Environmental Science
The Public Economics of Climate Change

Agnar Sandmo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2693142

2015-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:This paper considers the challenges to the field of public economics that arise from the issue of global warming. It outlines the argument for viewing the global climate as a public good and describes the problems that emerge when one tries to apply the insights of public goods theory to global public goods such as global warming. Special topics considered include the free rider problem in an international context and the extent to which private preferences should be taken into account in policy formation. The paper also includes a discussion of cost sharing in global climate policy and the design of policy when instruments for redistribution are imperfect. Green taxes are powerful tools for regulating emissions, and these are discussed both in a national and international context with emphasis on the proposal for a global CO2 tax. Finally there is a discussion of the several dimensions of distributional justice that arise in the context of climate policy.
A Time for Action on Climate Change and a Time for Change in Economics

Nicholas Stern

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac005

2022-02-01

The Economic Journal

Abstract:Abstract The case for action on climate change with urgency and at scale rests on the immense magnitude of climate risk, the very rapid emissions reductions which are necessary, and that there is a real opportunity to create a new and attractive form of growth and development. The analysis must be based on a dynamic approach to the economics of public policy, set in a complex, imperfect and uncertain world. The economics of climate change, and further, economics more broadly, must change to respond to the challenge of how to foster rapid transformation. It is time for economics and economists to step up.

economics
The economics of immense risk, urgent action and radical change: towards new approaches to the economics of climate change

Nicholas Stern,Joseph Stiglitz,Charlotte Taylor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2022.2040740

2022-02-26

Journal of Economic Methodology

Abstract:Designing policy for climate change requires analyses which integrate the interrelationship between the economy and the environment. We argue that, despite their dominance in the economics literature and influence in public discussion and policymaking, the methodology employed by Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) rests on flawed foundations, which become particularly relevant in relation to the realities of the immense risks and challenges of climate change, and the radical changes in our economies that a sound and effective response require. We identify a set of critical methodological problems with the IAMs which limit their usefulness and discuss the analytic foundations of an alternative approach that is more capable of providing insights into how best to manage the transition to net-zero emissions.

economics
The Political Economy of Climate Change: the Impasse and Way Out

Fusheng Xie,Han Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2021.1885780

2021-01-01

Abstract:Mainstream economics attributes climate change to negative externalities of carbon emissions and the lack of climate property rights. Although market-based strategies such as emission trading are widely implemented under the guideline of mainstream economics, there is no evidence that the accelerating trend of global warming has been contained. Marxian economists criticise the theoretical point of departure of the mainstream perspective about climate change and climate governance, and propose an alternative analytical framework focussing on the relationship between climate and capital accumulation. Following the Marxian perspective, we discuss the subject, nature, strategy, and possibility of a popular climate movement that could serve as an alternative to the existing mainstream climate governance.
Looking Backward, Looking Forward

William Nordhaus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-112223-091502

IF: 6.6171

2024-11-07

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Abstract:This essay discusses three themes of my scholarly life from my student days up to today. They involve technological change, environmental accounting, and energy-climate-economic analysis. These themes have common analytical roots in the economic theory of public goods and encounter thorny issues of governance because of the Westphalian roots of international law and practice. Many of the issues, such as devising measures of natural capital and the need for strengthened international institutions, are just as pressing today as they were during my student days in the 1960s. In writing this, the enduring insight is that hindsight is the best foresight.

economics,environmental studies,agricultural economics & policy
The politics of climate denialism and the secondary denialism of economics

Clifford William Cobb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12606

2024-12-06

American Journal of Economics and Sociology

Abstract:Primary climate‐change denialism rejects the idea that global warming is driven by human activity. This belief system now appeals to about one‐third of Americans. Having been influenced by a 1990s Exxon campaign to sow doubt that fossil fuels are responsible for global warming, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to be primary climate‐change deniers. But polls show that many US climate‐change accepters do not take it seriously enough to pay a nominal sum to prevent continued warming. This secondary denialism (accept the science, deny the urgency of action) may stem from the economic analysis of climate change. Discounting future damage and believing that economic growth will compensate for damage are two standard features of economic theory that justify treating climate issues with a degree of apathy—or at least as low priority. The work of Nobel‐Prize‐winning economist William Nordhaus provides almost as much cause for indifference among accepters as the climate denialists offer their followers. Scientists may view climate change with alarm, but policy‐makers mostly take their cues from economists. Nordhaus stated in a popular book in 2008 that his model demonstrates that 3.45°C warming is economically optimal. Not just tolerable, but optimal. His work is highly influential. Even though some economists have objected to the methods of economic analysis that understate the perils of climate change, their voices have had little influence on policy. Thus, seeming partisan differences about climate change have converged around go‐slow polices that manage climate issues as technical problems and that do not impose significant demands upon citizens or disrupt present economic arrangements.

economics,sociology
Creating An Earth Atmospheric Trust

Peter Barnes,Robert Costanza,Paul Hawken,David Orr,Elinor Ostrom,Alvaro Umaña,Oran Young

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.319.5864.724b

2008-01-01

Abstract:Stabilizing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the Earth's atmosphere at a level that will fulfill the mandate of the UN Framework Concentration on Climate Change to avoid " dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system" will require drastic departures from business as usual. Here we introduce one attractive response to this challenge that may seem visionary or idealistic today but that could well become realistic once we reach a tipping point regarding climate change that opens a window of opportunity for embracing major changes. No silver bullet exists capable of solving the complex and interdependent problems of climate change, sustainability, and economic development. A consensus is emerging, however, that solving these problems will require major changes in existing governance arrangements to eliminate or at least alleviate what the 2006 Stern Review (1) calls the "greatest and widest-ranging market failure ever seen" - the failure of the market to send proper signals about the real costs of using the atmosphere as a repository for greenhouse gases. This case exhibits the defining features of market failures surrounding open-access resources (2-6). Because emitters allowed to use the atmospheric commons as a repository for the wastes associated with burning fossil fuels at no cost, they have every incentive to use as much of this free factor of production as
Climate change, tipping points, and economics

Aart de Zeeuw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102185

IF: 1.831

2024-04-01

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

Abstract:This paper discusses the response of the economics profession to a possible occurrence of tipping points in natural systems, with a drop in welfare. For a climate tipping point, the hazard-rate model is relevant, and the paper shows that in a Ramsey growth model with climate tipping, the effect on policy is increased saving and increased taxation of greenhouse gas emissions. Climate change is often seen as a tragedy of the commons because incentives to deviate undermine cooperation and prevention of climate change. However, a climate tipping point can be prevented in a Nash equilibrium or with partial cooperation if the drop in welfare is sufficiently high. In case of uncertainty about the threshold, this result remains if the uncertainty is not too large. In the conclusion, the paper makes a few remarks on including tipping points in teaching environmental and resource economics.

economics
Complexity, economic science and possible economic benefits of climate change mitigation policy

J. F. Mercure,H. Pollitt,U. Chewpreecha,P. Salas,A. Foley,P. B. Holden,N. R. Edwards,J.F. Mercure

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.4403

2013-10-16

Physics and Society

Abstract:Conventional economic analysis of stringent climate change mitigation policy generally concludes various levels of economic slowdown as a result of substantial spending on low carbon technology. Equilibrium economics however could not explain or predict the current economic crisis, which is of financial nature. Meanwhile the economic impacts of climate policy find their source through investments for the diffusion of environmental innovations, in parts a financial problem. Here, we expose how results of economic analysis of climate change mitigation policy depend entirely on assumptions and theory concerning the finance of the diffusion of innovations, and that in many cases, results are simply re-iterations of model assumptions. We show that, while equilibrium economics always predict economic slowdown, methods using non-equilibrium approaches suggest the opposite could occur. We show that the solution to understanding the economic impacts of reducing greenhouse gas emissions lies with research on the dynamics of the financial sector interacting with innovation and technology developments, economic history providing powerful insights through important analogies with previous historical waves of innovation.
Natural climate solutions are not enough

Christa M Anderson,Ruth S DeFries,Robert Litterman,Pamela A Matson,Daniel C Nepstad,Stephen Pacala,William H Schlesinger,M Rebecca Shaw,Pete Smith,Christopher Weber,Christopher B Field,Christa M. Anderson,Ruth S. DeFries,Pamela A. Matson,Daniel C. Nepstad,William H. Schlesinger,M. Rebecca Shaw,Christopher B. Field

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw2741

IF: 56.9

2019-03-01

Science

Abstract:Decarbonizing the economy must remain a critical priority

multidisciplinary sciences
Timing Is Everything: How Economists Can Better Address the Urgency of Stronger Climate Policy

Lawrence H Goulder,Lawrence H. Goulder

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez014

IF: 7.0481

2020-01-01

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Abstract:Building on recent consensus findings from climate scientists, this article argues that stronger policy action to address global climate change is urgent. The article indicates how economists can better address this urgency and thereby contribute more effectively to climate policy discussions. Greater effectiveness requires that economists focus their policy assessments more sharply on the timing of policy implementation and the environmental and economic costs of delayed implementation. The article also shows that focusing more on the prospects for near-term implementation can alter the cost rankings of U.S. climate policy alternatives, increasing the attractiveness of some climate policy approaches that economists might otherwise tend to dismiss.

economics,environmental studies
Rethinking academia in a time of climate crisis

Anne E Urai,Clare Kelly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84991

IF: 7.7

2023-02-08

eLife

Abstract:Addressing the climate crisis requires radical and urgent action at all levels of society. Universities are ideally positioned to lead such action but are largely failing to do so. At the same time, many academic scientists find their work impeded by bureaucracy, excessive competitiveness, and a loss of academic freedom. Here, drawing on the framework of "Doughnut Economics," developed by Kate Raworth, we suggest seven new principles for rethinking the norms of scientific practice. Based on these, we propose a call to action, and encourage academics to take concrete steps towards the creation of a flourishing scientific enterprise that is fit for the challenges of the 21 st century.

biology
Some Economic Aspects Of Climate Change

zhong xiang zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.1996.028272

1996-01-01

International Journal of Environment and Pollution

Abstract:In recent years, increasing attention has been given to economic analyses of a variety of aspects of climate change. By discussing the consequences of climate change, damage estimates for a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, and strategies for responding to climate change, this paper attempts to keep audiences both within and outside the economics profession informed of the ongoing debate on global warming.
The Challenging Economic and Social Issues of Climate Change: Introduction

ZX Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00146-0

IF: 9

2004-01-01

Energy Policy

Abstract:At first glance, climate change is an environmental issue. However, combating global climate change requires fundamental changes in the ways energy is used and produced. Given that energy is a prerequisite input to fuel economic growth and the necessity of all human beings, therefore, climate change is in reality an economic and social issue as well as an environmental issue. Dealing with such a challenging issue not only needs warm hearts, but even more importantly cool heads. It is in this spirit that, in this special issue of Energy Policy, twenty three eminent analysts at MIT, Stanford, Brookings Institution, Resources for the Future, the President's Council of Economic Advisers, and others from Asia and the Pacific, Europe and the US tackle the economic and social aspects of climate change and offer their views on some of the most difficult issues - economic and environmental implications of the US withdrawal from the Kyoto Protocol, linkage of climate policy with technological innovations and trade policy, carbon taxes and their implications for environmental effectiveness, competitiveness and distribution of income, emissions trading, the discount rate, compliance, baseline setting for clean development mechanism projects, and ancillary benefits of carbon abatement - as well as the framework of encouraging wider participation and earlier reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. This guest editorial provides a summary of each contribution to the special issue (ZhongXiang Zhang (guest editor), Special Issue on An Economic Analysis of Climate Policy: Essays in Honour of Andries Nentjes, Energy Policy, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 467-479). The special issue is appealing not only for academic people but also policy makers, not only for people from the North but also for those from the South. We dedicate the issue to Prof. Andries Nentjes on the occasion of his retirement.
Summary of a workshop on extreme weather events in a warming world organized by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences

Deliang Chen,Henning Rodhe,Kerry Emanuel,Sonia I. Seneviratne,Panmao Zhai,Bert Allard,Peter Berg,Svante Björck,Ian A. Brown,Lars Bärring,Léon Chafik,Kaiqiang Deng,Marie-Jose Gaillard-Lemdahl,Magnus Hieronymus,Erik Kjellström,Hans W. Linderholm,Wilhelm May,Jens-Ove Näslund,Tinghai Ou,Anna Rutgersson,Erik Sahlee,Frederik Schenk,Jesper Sjolte,Moa K. Sporre,Anders Stigebrandt,Gesa A. Weyhenmeyer,Peng Zhang,Qiong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16000889.2020.1794236

2020-01-01

Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology

Abstract:<span>Climate change is not only about changes in means of climatic variables such as temperature, precipitation and wind, but also their extreme values which are of critical importance to human society and ecosystems. To inspire the Swedish climate research community and to promote assessments of international research on past and future changes in extreme weather events against the global climate change background, the Earth Science Class of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences organized a workshop entitled 'Extreme weather events in a warming world' in 2019. This article summarizes and synthesizes the key points from the presentations and discussions of the workshop on changes in floods, droughts, heat waves, as well as on tropical cyclones and extratropical storms. In addition to reviewing past achievements in these research fields and identifying research gaps with a focus on Sweden, future challenges and opportunities for the Swedish climate research community are highlighted.</span>

Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics

Climate Change, Carbon Neutrality: the Role of Spatial Economics

The Climate Casino: Risk, Uncertainty, and Economics for a Warming World

Form Indifference to Difference——Remarks on the Contribution of 2008 Nobel Laureate in Economics

Feedback, Dynamics, and Optimal Control in Climate Economics

William D. Nordhaus Managing the Commons: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 1994, ISBN 0-262-140551-1

The Public Economics of Climate Change

A Time for Action on Climate Change and a Time for Change in Economics

The economics of immense risk, urgent action and radical change: towards new approaches to the economics of climate change

The Political Economy of Climate Change: the Impasse and Way Out

Looking Backward, Looking Forward

The politics of climate denialism and the secondary denialism of economics

Creating An Earth Atmospheric Trust

Climate change, tipping points, and economics

Complexity, economic science and possible economic benefits of climate change mitigation policy

Natural climate solutions are not enough

Timing Is Everything: How Economists Can Better Address the Urgency of Stronger Climate Policy

Rethinking academia in a time of climate crisis

Some Economic Aspects Of Climate Change

The Challenging Economic and Social Issues of Climate Change: Introduction

Summary of a workshop on extreme weather events in a warming world organized by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences