Integrated assessment of computed tomography density in pectoralis and erector spinae muscles as a prognostic biomarker for Coronavirus Disease 2019
Kensuke Nakagawara,Yusuke Shiraishi,Shotaro Chubachi,Naoya Tanabe,Tomoki Maetani,Takanori Asakura,Ho Namkoong,Hiromu Tanaka,Takashi Shimada,Shuhei Azekawa,Shiro Otake,Takahiro Fukushima,Mayuko Watase,Hideki Terai,Mamoru Sasaki,Soichiro Ueda,Yukari Kato,Norihiro Harada,Shoji Suzuki,Shuichi Yoshida,Hiroki Tateno,Yoshitake Yamada,Masahiro Jinzaki,Toyohiro Hirai,Yukinori Okada,Ryuji Koike,Makoto Ishii,Akinori Kimura,Seiya Imoto,Satoru Miyano,Seishi Ogawa,Takanori Kanai,Koichi Fukunaga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2024.02.004
IF: 7.643
2024-02-07
Clinical Nutrition
Abstract:Summary Background & Aims Muscle quantification using chest computed tomography (CT) is a useful prognostic biomarker for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, no studies have evaluated the clinical course through comprehensive assessment of the pectoralis and erector spinae muscles. Therefore, we compared the impact of the areas and densities of these muscles on COVID-19 infection outcome. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted by the COVID-19 Task Force. A total of 1410 patients with COVID-19 were included, and data on the area and density of the pectoralis and erector spinae muscles on chest CT were collected. The impact of each muscle parameter on the clinical outcome of COVID-19 was stratified according to sex. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with severe disease, including those requiring oxygen supplementation and those who died. Additionally, 167 patients were followed up for changes in muscle parameters at three months and for the clinical characteristics in case of reduced CT density. Results For both muscles, low density rather than muscle area was associated with COVID-19 severity. Regardless of sex, lower erector spinae muscle density was associated with more severe disease than pectoralis muscle density. The muscles were divided into two groups using the receiver operating characteristic curve of CT density, and the population was classified into four (Group A: high CT density for both muscles, Group B: low CT density for pectoralis and high for erector spinae muscle. Group C: high CT density for pectoralis and low for erector spinae muscle, Group D: low CT density for both muscles). In univariate analysis, Group D patients exhibited worse outcomes than Group A (OR: 2.96, 95% CI: 2.03–4.34 in men; OR: 3.02, 95% CI: 2.66–10.4 in women). Multivariate analysis revealed that men in Group D had a significantly more severe prognosis than those in Group A (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.16–2.87). Moreover, Group D patients tended to have the highest incidence of other complications due to secondary infections and acute kidney injury during the clinical course. Longitudinal analysis of both muscle densities over three months revealed that patients with decreased muscle density over time were more likely to have severe cases than those who did not. Conclusions Muscle density, rather than muscle area, predicts the clinical outcomes of COVID-19. Integrated assessment of pectoralis and erector spinae muscle densities demonstrated higher accuracy in predicting the clinical course of COVID-19 than individual assessments.
nutrition & dietetics