Commentary on stimulus‐induced arousal with transient electroencephalographic improvement distinguishes nonictal from ictal generalized periodic discharges

Marcus C. Ng,Sahar Zafar,Brandon Foreman,Jennifer Kim,Aaron F. Struck,M. Brandon Westover
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18159
IF: 6.74
2024-10-20
Epilepsia
Abstract:Here we critique recent arguments proposing to distinguish ictal from non‐ictal generalized periodic discharges (GPDs) based on etiology and stimulation response, arguing that these are unreliable. We advocate for an empirical approach to GPDs: describe objectively, interpret through medication trials, and base further treatment on response. We call for evidence‐based approaches considering meaningful clinical outcomes.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?