Abstract:This study aims to compare the effectiveness of renewable energy and circular economy practices in reducing environmental damage and poverty in China and the European Union (EU) by using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach and the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) technique. Analyzing data from 1995 to 2022, we compared the effectiveness of these approaches in both regions. This study offers several fresh perspectives on the fight against environmental damage and poverty, differentiating itself from existing research in a few key ways. In fact, most studies focus on a single region's approach to sustainability. However, this research directly compares China and the European Union (EU), highlighting how factors like economic structure and development stages influence the effectiveness of renewable energy and circular economy practices. Also, this study shows how renewable energy and circular practices can simultaneously tackle both environmental damage (emissions) and social issues (poverty). Our findings reveal that factors like poverty, fossil fuel reliance, economic growth, and international trade all contribute to rising carbon emissions in both China and the EU, though their influence varies. Interestingly, China experienced greater success in curbing emissions through solar power, circular economy measures, and wind power compared to the EU. Additionally, the impact of these strategies on poverty reduction differed significantly between the two regions. Based on these results, we recommend that policy makers in both regions develop tailored strategies for tackling carbon emissions and poverty. Prioritizing renewable energy sources and circular practices is key, as they can simultaneously reduce emissions and alleviate poverty. However, it is crucial to focus on approaches that work best in each specific region, considering social, economic, and environmental factors. This study suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach will not work for fighting climate change and poverty. While renewable energy and circular economies are effective, China saw greater success with solar and wind power compared to the EU. Policy makers need to design strategies specific to their region's economic, social, and environmental context. Further research can refine these approaches, and public education is crucial to promote sustainable behavior and empower policy makers. It is also needed to refine and improve the implementation of these strategies. Finally, public awareness and education are essential to promote sustainable behavior and empower policy makers in their fight against climate change and poverty. This study highlights the importance of a region-specific approach to energy transition and poverty alleviation. By comparing China and the EU, we gain valuable insights into the effectiveness of different strategies in tackling these interconnected challenges. The findings provide valuable guidance for policy makers looking to create a more sustainable and equitable future.

Economic Policies for the Sustainability Transition: Approaches, Outcomes and Prospects in the EU and China

Designing and implementing policies for transformative change in Europe: ideas, policy mixes, actors

Economic complexity and the sustainability transition: A review of data, methods, and literature

Transitioning to Tomorrow: The Global Journey Towards a Sustainable Energy Economy

How Can We Design Policy Better? Frameworks and Approaches for Sustainability Transitions

Sustainable development economy and the development of green economy in the European Union

The evolution of sustainable economic development: Trends, trade-offs and trajectories for balanced economic activities

Social Entrepreneurship As a Catalyst for Sustainability Transitions: the China Case

Sustainable agriculture in the EU and China: A comparative critical policy analysis approach

Lessons, narratives, and research directions for a sustainable circular economy

Sustainability under policy transitions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: Historical and the shared socio-economic pathways

The Societal Strength of Transition: a Critical Review of the Circular Economy Through the Lens of Inclusion

A Chinese route to sustainability: Postsocialist transitions and the construction of ecological civilization

Economic transition policies in Chinese resource-based cities: An overview of government efforts

Energy Transition and Poverty Alleviation in Light of Environmental and Economic Challenges: A Comparative Study in China and the European Union Region

Development towards sustainability: How to judge past and proposed policies?

Energy transition for meeting ecological goals: Do economic stability, technology, and government stability matter?

New Territories of Sustainable Fashion Proposals for the Transition towards sustainability and circularity

Targeting net-zero emissions while advancing other sustainable development goals in China

How is energy transition shaping a path to common prosperity and sustainable economic growth?

Technologies and policies for the transition to a sustainable energy system in china