Abstract:Point, line and/or planar defects are ubiquitously present in all materials and intentional introduction and control of defects plays a key role in the development of advanced materials with better performance and new functionality. Well-known examples include doping semiconductors to modify the band structure and using phase or grain boundaries to strengthen alloys. Like other materials, battery intercalation compounds contain various types of defects, and “defect engineering” is a promising strategy for this class of materials, which nonetheless has not yet been widely explored. In particular, recent studies find that antisite defects in battery compounds, can promote Li transport by opening up alternative diffusion channels with lower migration energies in numerous lithium-ion battery electrode materials, which enhances the rate performance of batteries. Antisite defects are also reported to improve the stability and cyclability of cubic LixTi2O4. These examples demonstrate that the rational tailoring of antisite defects provides a potentially general approach to improving battery electrode properties. Here we present a computational study that reveals a new mechanism of antisite defects enhancing the rate capability of intercalation compounds by accelerating surface-reaction-limited (SRL) phase transformation during battery charge/discharge. Antisite defects are generated when the sites of intercalating ions are occupied by other cations that are usually less mobile. A prominent effect of antisite defects in battery electrodes is to block the existing paths of intercalating ions and generate new migration pathways at the same time. For intercalation compounds with strong anisotropic transport properties, such effect usually leads to the reduction in the diffusion anisotropy of intercalating ions, which has already been observed in practically synthesized lithium iron phosphate olivine (LiFePO4). In this work, we discovered that although antisite defects in LiFePO4 impede Li movement in the fast [010] diffusion direction, their ability to enhance transport along other slower diffusion directions leads to an unexpected increase in the phase transition rate when it is kinetically limited by surface reaction. Figure 1. compares the discharge simulations of two LiFePO4 particles with different antisite defect concentrations. Orders-of-magnitude improvement in SRL phase transformation kinetics is observed in “defect-rich” particle due to the increase of active surface area for Li intercalation. More transparent understanding of such mechanism was obtained by solving 1D depth-average model numerically and analytically. Meanwhile, it is revealed that the presence of defects causes Li intercalation time to increase less pronouncedly with particle sizes, and can reduce the risk of electrochemical shock under galvanostatic (dis)charge conditions by homogenizing the reaction flux. Due to the kinetic competition between surface reaction and bulk diffusion, an optimal defect concentration is predicted to exist for a given particle geometry to maximize the Li (de)intercalation rate. Criteria for the co-design of defect content and particle morphology are proposed. Counter-intuitively, we find that (100)-oriented LiFePO4 platelike particles may exhibit even better rate performance than (010)-oriented plate particles in the SRL kinetic regime, which are commonly viewed as the most desirable LiFePO4 particle morphology. While we demonstrate the possibility of using antisite defects to accelerate phase transitions in LiFePO4, it has general applicability to other phase-changing battery materials that exhibit ion diffusion anisotropy. Figure 1

Quenching‐Induced Defects Liberate the Latent Reversible Capacity of Lithium Titanate Anode

High‐Pressure Induction and Quantitative Regulation of Oxygen Vacancy Defects in Lithium Titanate

PPy‐encapsulated SnS2 Nanosheets Stabilized by Defects on a TiO2 Support As a Durable Anode Material for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Defect-Enhanced Phase Transformation Kinetics in Intercalation Compounds

Pre‐activation and Defects Introduced Via Citric Acid to Mitigate Capacity and Voltage Fading in Li‐rich Cathode

Defect Engineering of Vanadium Pentoxide for Efficient Lithium-Ion Storage

Oxygen Vacancy-Modulated Zeolitic Li4ti5o12 Microsphere Anode for Superior Lithium-Ion Battery

Tailoring Native Defects and Zinc Impurities in Li4ti5o12: Insights from First-Principles Study

Understanding and Controlling Structural Defects and Disordering in LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Cathodes for Direct Recycling

Mitigating Evolution of Lattice Oxygen and Stabilizing Structure of Lithium-Rich Oxides by Fabricating Surface Oxygen Defects

Abundant nanoscale defects to eliminate voltage decay in Li-rich cathode materials

Plasma-Induced Defect Engineering in TiNb 2 O 7 for Boosting Lithium-Ion Diffusion

Pressure-induced high performance Li4Ti5O12-Li2Ti3O7 defect electrode

Defect engineering of air-stable Li5FeO4 towards an ultra-high capacity cathode prelithiation additive

Boosting Solid‐State Reconversion Reactivity to Mitigate Lithium Trapping for High Initial Coulombic Efficiency

High−Performance organic lithium−ion battery with plastic crystal electrolyte

The Origin of Enhanced Conductivity and Structure Change in Defective Li4Ti5O12 or Blue-LTO : a study combined theoretical and experimental perspectives

Tuning 4f‐Center Electron Structure by Schottky Defects for Catalyzing Li Diffusion to Achieve Long‐Term Dendrite‐Free Lithium Metal Battery

Interfacial "Single‐Atom‐in‐Defects" Catalysts Accelerating Li+ Desolvation Kinetics for Long‐lifespan Lithium Metal Batteries

Boosting Electrochemical Performance of Lithium-Rich Manganese-Based Cathode Materials Through a Dual Modification Strategy with Defect Designing and Interface Engineering.

Facilitating catalytic activity of indium oxide in lithium-sulfur batteries by controlling oxygen vacancies