Abstract:Globally, numerous ecosystems have been co‐invaded by multiple exotic plant species that can have competitive or facilitative interactions with each other and with native plants. Invaded ecosystems often exhibit spatial heterogeneity in soil moisture and nutrient levels, with some habitats having more nutrient‐rich and moist soils than others. The stress‐gradient hypothesis predicts that plants are likely to engage in facilitative interactions when growing in stressful environments, such as nutrient‐deficient or water‐deficient soils. In contrast, when resources are abundant, competitive interactions between plants should prevail. The invasional meltdown hypothesis proposes that facilitative interactions between invasive species can enhance their establishment and amplify their ecological impact. Considering both hypotheses can offer insights into the complex interactions among invasive and native plants across environmental gradients. However, experimental tests of the effects of soil moisture and nutrient co‐limitation on interactions between invasive and native plants at both interspecific and intraspecific levels in light of these hypotheses are lacking. We performed a greenhouse pot experiment in which we cultivated individual focal plants from five congeneric pairs of invasive and native species. Each focal plant was subjected to one of three levels of plant–plant interactions: (1) intraspecific, in which the focal plant was grown with another individual of the same species; (2) interspecific, involving a native and an invasive plant; and (3) interspecific, involving two native or invasive individuals. These plant–plant interaction treatments were fully crossed with two levels of water availability (drought vs. well‐watered) and two levels of nutrient supply (low vs. high). Consistent with the stress‐gradient and invasional meltdown hypotheses, our findings show that under low‐nutrient conditions, the biomass production of invasive focal plants was facilitated by invasive interspecific neighbors. However, under high‐nutrient conditions, the biomass production of invasive focal plants was suppressed by invasive interspecific neighbors. When competing with native interspecific neighbors, high‐nutrient conditions similarly enhanced the biomass production of both invasive and native focal plants. Invasive and native focal plants were neither competitively suppressed nor facilitated by conspecific neighbors. Taken together, these results suggest that co‐occurring invasive exotic plant species may facilitate each other in low‐nutrient habitats but compete in high‐nutrient habitats.

Darwin's naturalization conundrum reconciled by changes of species interactions

The impact of species phylogenetic relatedness on invasion varies distinctly along resource versus non‐resource environmental gradients

Contrasting Effects of Phylogenetic Relatedness on Plant Invader Success in Experimental Grassland Communities

The effects of phylogenetic relatedness on invasion success and impact: deconstructing Darwin's naturalisation conundrum

Data From: the Effects of Phylogenetic Relatedness on Invasion Success and Impact: Deconstructing Darwin’s Naturalization Conundrum

Darwin&rsquo;s Naturalization Conundrum: an Unsolved Paradox in Invasion Ecology

Different Effects of Invader-Native Phylogenetic Relatedness on Invasion Success and Impact: A Meta-Analysis of Darwin'S Naturalization Hypothesis

Darwin’s naturalization conundrum can be explained by spatial scale

Non-native plants tend to be phylogenetically distant but functionally similar to native plants under intense disturbance at the Three Gorges Reservoir Area

Darwin's Naturalization Conundrum explained by gradients of environmental stress and disturbance

Responses of Soil Microbial Community Size, Respiration Rate and Functional Diversity to Invasive Plant Species Richness

Limiting similarity and Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis: understanding the drivers of biotic resistance against invasive plant species

Positive Feedback Between Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plants Influences Plant Invasion Success and Resistance to Invasion

Invasive‐plant traits, native‐plant traits, and their divergences as invasion factors

Contrasting responses of naturalized alien and native plants to native soil biota and drought

Phenological similarity and distinctiveness facilitate plant invasions

Rapid evolutionary trade‐offs between resistance to herbivory and tolerance to abiotic stress in an invasive plant

Research Progress on Phenotypic Plasticity of Invasive Plants in Response to Drought Stress

Co-Invasion of Congeneric Invasive Plants Adopts Different Strategies Depending on Their Origins

Invaders responded more positively to soil biota than native or noninvasive introduced species, consistent with enemy escape

Invasive plant species support each other's growth in low‐nutrient conditions but compete when nutrients are abundant