Abstract:Alternative models of traumatic stress and broader psychopathology have been proposed to address issues of heterogeneity, comorbidity, clinical utility, and equitable representation. However, systematic and practical methods and guidelines to organize and apply these models remain scarce. The Middle-Out Approach is a novel, integrative, contextually informed framework for organizing and applying existing empirical methods to evaluate current and alternative traumatic stress reactions. Rather than beginning to identify traumatic stress reactions from the top-down (i.e., disorder-first approach) or bottom-up (i.e., symptom-first approach), constructs are evaluated from the middle out (i.e., presentation-first approach), unconstrained by higher-order disorders or lower-order diagnostic symptoms. This approach provides innovation over previous methods at multiple levels, including the conceptualization of traumatic stress reactions as well as the type of assessments and data sources used and how they are used in statistical analyses. Conceptualizations prioritize the identification of middle-order phenotypes, representing person-centered clinical presentations, which are informed by the integration of multidimensional, transdiagnostic, and multimodal (e.g., psychosocial, physiological) assessments and/or data sources. Integrated data are then analyzed concurrently using person-centered statistical models to identify precise, discrete, and representative health outcomes within broader heterogeneous samples. Subsequent variable-centered analyses are then used to identify culturally sensitive and contextually informed correlates of phenotypes, their clinical utility, and the differential composition within and between broader traumatic stress reactions. Examples from the moral injury literature are used to illustrate practical applications that may increase clinical utility and the accurate representation of health outcomes for diverse individuals and communities.

Controversies in trauma- and stress-related disorders

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the DSM-5: Controversy, Change, and Conceptual Considerations

ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder, complex PTSD and adjustment disorder: the importance of stressors and traumatic life events

Emerging experience with selected new categories in the ICD-11: complex PTSD, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder

The memory and identity theory of ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder.

A paradigm shift in the conceptualization of psychological trauma in the 20th century

Cultural concepts of distress and complex PTSD: Future directions for research and treatment

Examining accurate diagnosis of complex PTSD in ICD-11

Testing the DSM-5 New Items and Algorithm Change for the Diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Latest developments in post-traumatic stress disorder: diagnosis and treatment

The Middle-Out Approach to reconceptualizing, assessing, and analyzing traumatic stress reactions

Complex trauma and the unseen: who gets to be a victim?

Dimensional approaches to studying, assessing, and treating traumatic stress: Introduction to the Special Section

Prevalence and concordance of International Classification of Diseases-11th Revision and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual-Fifth Edition posttraumatic stress diagnostics among Northern Irish military veterans.

Psychological interventions for ICD-11 complex PTSD symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis

Developmental trauma: Conceptual framework, associated risks and comorbidities, and evaluation and treatment

Post‐traumatic stress disorder: a state‐of‐the‐art review of evidence and challenges

Trauma, mind and brain: the impact of war on mental health

Dissociative Symptoms in Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review

Adjustment Disorder: Current Developments and Future Directions