Non-invasive prenatal testing for the detection of trisomy 13, 18, and 21 and sex chromosome aneuploidies in 68,763 cases
Yanchun Zhang,Hongyan Xu,Wen Zhang,Kaibo Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.864076
IF: 3.7
2022-09-15
Frontiers in Genetics
Abstract:Objectives: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely used in recent years. According to clinical experience from all hospitals providing prenatal screening services in Beijing, we explored the feasibility of using NIPT for the analysis of common foetal aneuploidies among pregnancies. Methods: In total, 68,763 maternal blood samples were collected from January 2020 to December 2020 at the Beijing prenatal diagnosis agency. Cases with positive screening results by NIPT detection were validated using prenatal diagnosis. Results: In total, 920 cases had a high-risk NIPT result, and 755 cases were shown to be truly positive by a chromosome karyotyping analysis; the prenatal diagnosis rate was 82.07% (755/920). Of the920 cases, there were 164 cases of T21, 70 cases of T18, 38 cases of T13, 360 cases of SCAs and 288 cases of other chromosomal abnormalities. The positive rates of T21, T18, T13, and SCAs were 0.24% (164/68,763), 0.10% (70/68,763), 0.06% (38/68,763) and 0.52% (360/68,763), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 98.17% and 99.92% for T21, 96.15% and 99.93% for T18, and 100% and 99.95% for T13, respectively. The PPVs of T21,T18,T13 and SCAs were65.24% (107/164), 35.71% (25/70), 18.42% (7/38) and 31.39% (113/360), respectively. For all indications, there were more higher T21/18/13 in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (comprising only cases of voluntary request), with a positive rate of 0.46% vs. 0.27% ( p < 0.001), sensitivity of 99.16% vs. 91.30% ( p = 0.02) and PPV of 56.73%vs.32.81% ( p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference in specificity between the groups ( p = 0.71). The detection indication with the highest PPV (100%) by NIPT was ultrasound structural abnormalities and ultrasound soft marker abnormalities for T21 and ultrasound structural abnormalities and NT thickening for T18 and T13. The PPVs of different clinical indications of T21 ( p = 0.002), T13 ( p = 0.04) and SACs ( p = 0.02) were statistically significant. Conclusion: The high specificity, efficiency and safety (non-invasiveness) of NIPT can effectively improve the detection rate of common chromosomal aneuploidy, thereby reducing the occurrence of birth defects. We should encourage pregnant women with NIPT-high-risk results to undergo a prenatal diagnosis to determine whether the foetus has chromosomal abnormalities. More importantly, the screening efficiency of NIPT in the low-risk group was significantly lower than that in the high-risk group. Therefore, the use of NIPT in low-risk groups should be fully promoted, and socioeconomic benefits should be considered.
genetics & heredity