Abstract:Background: With the introduction of the ICD-11 into clinical practice, the reliable distinction between Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) becomes paramount. The semi-structured clinician-administered International Trauma Interview (ITI) aims to close this gap in clinical and research settings. Objective: This study investigated the psychometric properties of the German version of the ITI among trauma-exposed clinical samples from Switzerland and Germany. Method: Participants were 143 civilian and 100 military participants, aged M = 40.3 years, of whom 53.5% were male. Indicators of reliability and validity (latent structure, internal reliability, inter-rater agreement, convergent and discriminant validity) were evaluated. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and partial correlation analysis were conducted separately for civilian and military participants. Results: Prevalence of PTSD was 30% (civilian) and 33% (military) and prevalence of CPTSD was 53% (civilians) and 21% (military). Satisfactory internal consistency and inter-rater agreement were found. In the military sample, a parsimonious first-order six-factor model was preferred over a second-order two-factor CFA model of ITI PTSD and Disturbances in Self-Organization (DSO). Model fit was excellent among military participants but no solution was supported among civilian participants. Overall, convergent validity was supported by positive correlations of ITI PTSD and DSO with DSM-5 PTSD. Discriminant validity for PTSD symptoms was confirmed among civilians but low in the military sample. Conclusions: The German ITI has shown potential as a clinician-administered diagnostic tool for assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in primary care. However, further exploration of its latent structure and discriminant validity are indicated. Antecedentes: Con la introducción de la CIE-11 en la práctica clínica, la distinción confiable entre el trastorno de estrés postraumático (TEPT) y el trastorno de estrés postraumático complejo (TEPTC) se vuelve primordial. La Entrevista Internacional de Trauma (ITI por sus siglas en inglés) semiestructurada administrada por un clínico tiene como objetivo cerrar esta brecha en los entornos clínicos y de investigación. Objetivo: Este estudio investigó las propiedades psicométricas de la versión alemana de la ITI entre muestras clínicas expuestas a traumas de Suiza y Alemania. Método: Los participantes fueron 143 civiles y 100 militares, edad M = 40.3 años, de los cuales el 53.5% eran hombres. Se evaluaron los indicadores de confiabilidad y validez (estructura latente, confiabilidad interna, acuerdo entre evaluadores, validez convergente y discriminante). El análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC) y el análisis de correlación parcial se realizaron por separado para los participantes civiles y militares. Resultados: La prevalencia del TEPT fue del 30% (civiles) y del 33% (militares) y la prevalencia de TEPTC fue del 53% (civiles) y del 21% (militares). Se encontró una consistencia interna y un acuerdo entre evaluadores satisfactoria. En la muestra militar, se prefirió un modelo parsimonioso de primer orden de seis factores a un modelo AFC de segundo orden de dos factores de la ITI TEPT y alteraciones en la autoorganización (AAO). El ajuste del modelo fue excelente entre los participantes militares, pero ninguna solución fue encontrada en los participantes civiles. En general, la validez convergente estuvo respaldada por correlaciones positivas de ITI TEPT y AAO con DSM-5 TEPT. La validez discriminante de los síntomas de TEPT se confirmó entre los civiles, pero fue baja en la muestra militar. Conclusiones: La ITI alemana ha demostrado un potencial como herramienta de diagnóstico administrada por clínicos para evaluar el TEPT y el TEPTC del CIE-11 en atención primaria. Sin embargo, se requiere una mayor exploración de su estructura latente y su validez discriminante.

Reliability and Validity of the Diagnostic Interview Trauma and Stressors- Intellectual Disability in Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities or Borderline Intellectual Functioning

Development and evaluation of the Trauma Screener‐Intellectual Disability: a post‐traumatic stress disorder screening tool for adults with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning

Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch International Trauma Questionnaire for the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases posttraumatic stress disorder and complex posttraumatic stress disorder.

Accuracy of the Diagnostic Infant and Preschool Assessment (DIPA) in a Dutch sample

How Well Can we Diagnose Autism in Adults? Evaluating an Informant-based Interview: The Dutch Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview – Adult Version (3Di-Adult)

Psychometric Properties of the Symptom Questionnaire-48 in Adults with Mild Intellectual Disability or Borderline Intellectual Functioning in Mental Health Care

Reliability and validity of the dynamic risk outcome scales—short version for clients with mild intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning

Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-KID)

An international field study of the ICD-11 behavioural indicators for disorders of intellectual development

Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines-Revised.

Internal structure and reliability of the Attachment Insecurity Screening Inventory (AISI) for children age 6 to 12

Development and preliminary validation of a screen for interpersonal childhood trauma experiences among school-going youth in Durban, South Africa

Item‐validity analysis of the SED‐S in a multicentre study of adults with intellectual disabilities

Diagnostic validity Polish language version of the questionnaire MINI-KID (Mini International Neuropsychiatry Interview for Children and Adolescent)

Measuring dysfunctional interpersonal beliefs: validation of the Interpersonal Cognitive Distortions Scale among a heterogeneous German-speaking sample

Assessing complex PTSD and PTSD: validation of the German version of the International Trauma Interview (ITI)

Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents

Reliability and Diagnostic Validity Study on Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised

Beyond abuse and neglect: validation of the childhood interpersonal trauma inventory in a community sample of adults

Psychometric properties of the Trauma and Distress Scale, TADS, in an adult community sample in Finland

Validity of Chinese Version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0 in Psychiatric Settings.