Long‐term response to idebenone treatment in a patient with advanced Leber hereditary optic neuropathy

Stamatina Kabanarou,Chrysoula Sgourou,Nikolaos Bitzanakis,Georgios Bontzos,Ilias Gkizis,Vasiliki Xirou,Tina Xirou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15891
2024-01-01
Acta Ophthalmologica
Abstract:Aims/Purpose: To present a case with advanced LHON and its response to 2‐year‐treatment with idebenone, which was prescribed 13 years after the onset of the disease. Methods: A 40‐year‐old Caucasian male patient with a history of bilateral painless visual loss since the age of 28 was examined at our Ophthalmology department. His brother had also suffered similar visual loss. At presentation ETDRS best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was counting fingers (CF) in both eyes (BE). Fundoscopy revealed pale optic discs bilaterally. Visual fields (30‐2) showed central scotomas in BE. During OCT/OCTA imaging of the optic disc RNFL and GCC thickness were decreased bilaterally. In electrophysiological assessment with flash visual evoked potentials a reduction in amplitude was recorded in BE but with normal latency. Full‐field ERG was within normal limits in BE. At the genetic test, a mitochondrial point mutation m. 3460 G>A at MT‐ND1 gene was detected, which was compatible with LHON. The patient was prescribed 300 mg idebenone per os three times/day for 24 months. Follow‐up visits were scheduled at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Results: At 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up visits visual acuity, fundoscopic findings and OCT‐RNFL imaging remained unchanged. However, the patient reported subjective visual improvement bilaterally, with greater improvement in the visual field of the left eye. At 18 months following initiation of treatment an improvement of the visual field was documented in BE. No change of the GCC thickness was noted. At 2‐year follow‐up his condition remained improved. Conclusions: Delayed treatment with idebenone in advanced LHON can lead to subjective visual improvement. Moreover, an improvement in visual fields can also be documented even after 18 to 24 months of the initiation of the treatment.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?