Abstract:Purpose The development of digital inclusive finance (DIF) has increased households' financial investments and consumption. However, few studies have considered whether DIF strengthens the substitution of household financial investment for consumption behavior. To clarify the relationship between DIF, household financial investment and household consumption behavior, the authors combine matched data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) and Peking University Digital Inclusive Finance Index (2011–2018) to explore the impact of DIF on household financial substitution. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned objectives. Design/methodology/approach This study's empirical analysis applies ordinary least squares (OLS) to answer how DIF affects household financial investment substitution for consumption. This study uses three approaches to examine the robustness of the benchmark regression model. These three approaches are replacing the core explanatory variables, using the lagged Digital Inclusive Finance Index and using the data of additional years. This article also assesses endogeneity by applying the instrumental variable method. Findings The results indicate that DIF significantly enhances household financial substitution. This article also assesses endogeneity by applying the instrumental variable method and robustness test methods. The impact mechanism test shows that DIF positively affects household financial substitution, by improving information dissemination efficiency and enhancing financial participation. Further research finds that the impact of DIF on household financial substitution is more pronounced in households with low to moderate savings rates, low to average income households and homes without family members who start their businesses. Research limitations/implications This study analyzed the effect and mediating mechanisms of digital financial inclusion on household financial substitution. Like all studies, the research had some limitations. First, due to differences in culture and infrastructure development, people do not understand and judge economic behaviors, such as household financial investment and consumption, in the same way. It can lead to certain biases in their understanding and study responses. Second, the study is mainly based on data from China. Future studies should be extended to foreign countries for comparative analysis. Third, the development of DIF has not yet completed a full cycle, and many problems have not been fully identified. Practical implications This study provides some practical implication. First, the public sectors should effectively weigh the spending relationship between household financial investment and consumption. Second, the public sector should focus on the policy optimization and consistency of DIF. The public sector should both enhance the breadth of coverage and depth of impact of DIF and focus on long-tail groups to fully reflect the equity and inclusiveness of DIF. Originality/value This study responds to the discussion on the relationship between financial investment, saving and consumption games in household expenditures and enhances our understanding of how DIF affects households' complex economic behavior. The most revealing finding is that DIF reinforces the substitution of household financial investment for household consumption. DIF positively affects household financial substitution by improving the efficiency of information dissemination and increasing financial participation, which is a valid extension of the study on the mechanisms of information dissemination and financial participation in financial investment and consumption proposed.

Digital inclusive finance and migrant wages: Evidence from over 700,000 internal migrants in China

Can digital financial inclusion help reduce migrant workers' overwork? Evidence from China

Digital economy and income of migrant workers from rural China

The impact of green digital finance on migration decisions: Evidence from China

Digital financial inclusion and vulnerability to poverty: evidence from Chinese rural households

Digital inclusive finance and rural household subsistence consumption in China

Digital financial inclusion and the share of labor income: Firm-level evidence

Research on the impact of digital inclusive finance on the performance of rural returnee entrepreneurs in China

How does digital inclusive finance influence non-agricultural employment among the rural labor force? --Evidence from micro-data in China

Impact of digital inclusive finance on household tourism consumption: evidence from China

Digital financial inclusion, industrial structure and urban-Rural income disparity: Evidence from Zhejiang Province, China

Has Digital Financial Inclusion Narrowed the Urban–Rural Income Gap? A Study of the Spatial Influence Mechanism Based on Data from China

Unraveling the influence and mechanism of digital inclusive finance on household financial substitution: evidence from China

Impact and Mechanism of Digital Inclusive Finance on the Urban–Rural Income Gap of China from a Spatial Econometric Perspective

The Influence of Foreign Direct Investment on Physical Health of Rural-Urban Migrants-Empirical Evidence from China Migrants Dynamic Survey

Digital finance, Bargaining Power and Gender Wage Gap

Digital financial inclusion and poverty alleviation: Evidence from the sustainable development of China

Digital inclusive finance, economic growth and innovative development

Digital Inclusive Finance Development and Labor Productivity: Based on a Capital-Deepening Perspective

Can China’s Digital Inclusive Finance Alleviate Rural Poverty? An Empirical Analysis from the Perspective of Regional Economic Development and an Income Gap

The impact of digital financial usage on resident’s income inequality in China: An empirical analysis based on CHFS data