Abstract:The lack of efficient discovery tools for advanced functional materials remains a major bottleneck to enabling advances in the next-generation energy, health, and sustainability technologies. One main factor contributing to this inefficiency is the large combinatorial space of materials (with respect to material compositions and processing conditions) that is typically redolent of such materials-centric applications. Searches of this large combinatorial space are often influenced by expert knowledge and clustered close to material configurations that are known to perform well, thus ignoring potentially high-performing candidates in unanticipated regions of the composition-space or processing protocol. Moreover, experimental characterization or first principles quantum mechanical calculations of all possible material candidates can be prohibitively expensive, making exhaustive approaches to determine the best candidates infeasible. As a result, there remains a need for the development of computational algorithms that can efficiently search a large parameter space for a given material application. Here, we introduce PAL 2.0, a method that combines a physics-based surrogate model with Bayesian optimization. The key contributing factor of our proposed framework is the ability to create a physics-based hypothesis using XGBoost and Neural Networks. This hypothesis provides a physics-based "prior" (or initial beliefs) to a Gaussian process model, which is then used to perform a search of the material design space. In this paper, we demonstrate the usefulness of our approach on three material test cases: (1) discovery of metal halide perovskites with desired photovoltaic properties, (2) design of metal halide perovskite-solvent pairs that produce the best solution-processed films and (3) design of organic thermoelectric semiconductors. Our results indicate that the novel PAL 2.0 approach outperforms other state-of-the-art methods in its efficiency to search the material design space for the optimal candidate. We also demonstrate the physics-based surrogate models constructed in PAL 2.0 have lower prediction errors for material compositions not seen by the model. To the best of our knowledge, there is no competing algorithm capable of this useful combination for materials discovery, especially those for which data are scarce.

Physical computing for materials acceleration platforms

Accelerating Materials Development via Automation, Machine Learning, and High-Performance Computing

Materials and devices as solutions to computational problems in machine learning

Materials Acceleration Platforms (MAPs) Accelerating Materials Research and Development to Meet Urgent Societal Challenges

Physics in the Machine: Integrating Physical Knowledge in Autonomous Phase-Mapping

Programmable responsive metamaterials for mechanical computing and robotics

Next-generation Intelligent Laboratories for Materials Design and Manufacturing

An Informatics Software Stack for Point Defect-Derived Opto-Electronic Properties: The Asphalt Project

Physical learning of power-efficient solutions

An object-oriented framework to enable workflow evolution across materials acceleration platforms

A Gamified Simulator and Physical Platform for Self-Driving Algorithm Training and Validation

Cutting-edge research in physics engines: Exploring parallel technologies, algorithm insights, and upcoming trends

Toward Autonomous Laboratories: Convergence of Artificial Intelligence and Experimental Automation

Bridging the Band Gap: What Device Physicists Need to Know About Machine Learning

Autonomous Battery Optimization by Deploying Distributed Experiments and Simulations

PAL 2.0: A Physics-Driven Bayesian Optimization Framework for Material Discovery

Human-In-the-Loop for Bayesian Autonomous Materials Phase Mapping

Accelerate & Actualize: Can 2D Materials Bridge the Gap Between Neuromorphic Hardware and the Human Brain?

Challenges in Developing Software for Cyber-Physical Systems

Roadmap on Emerging Hardware and Technology for Machine Learning

Physically Aware Synthesis Revisited: Guiding Technology Mapping with Primitive Logic Gate Placement