Workshop I: Evidence-informed approach to prescribing of atypical antipsychotics to manage behaviors in Neurocognitive disorders: Results of a pilot study

Atul Sunny Luthra,Raymond LinBin Gao,Peter Carducci,Joanna Sue,Shannon Remers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610223001461
IF: 7.191
2024-02-04
International Psychogeriatrics
Abstract:Background: The LuBAIRTM Paradigm is a novel approach to ascribe meaning to behavioral expressions in advanced neurocognitive disorders when the reliability of a clinical assessment is limited. The meaning ascribed to each behavioral category was used to identify those who are likely to respond to the use of atypical antipsychotics in their management. De-prescribing was attempted on patients who qualified to enter this retrospective study. De-prescribing was defined as successful if individuals were completely withdrawn from AAP and remained off them for 60 days without the re-emergence of behaviors. Methods: The LuBAIRTM Inventory was filled on two occasions. The data collected on the second occasion, in the successful and failed de-prescribed groups, were compared in this retrospective study. MANOVA, Chi-Square paired t-test statistical analyses were used to detect the differences in the behavioral categories between the two cohorts. Cohen d was used to measure effect size. Results: Patients who did not have Mis-Identification and Goal-Directed Expressions were more likely to successfully de-prescribe: X2 (1, N = 40) = 29.119 p < 0.0001 and X2 (1, N = 40) = 32.374, p < 0.0001, respectively. Alternatively, the same behavioral categories were more likely to be present in patients who failed de-prescribing: MANOVA and paired t-test (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Atypical antipsychotics, in their role as an antipsychotic and mood stabilizer, may be used to manage Mis-Identification and Goal-Directed Expressions, respectively.
psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,psychology, clinical,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?