Abstract:We study the impact of the number and type of calibration parameters on surface‐subsurface hydrologic model performance. We employ a framework of sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, and parameter estimation. We use results to evaluate parameterisation choices for two watersheds of diverse hydrologic features. We investigate the effect of calibration versus testing period length on the robustness of hydrologic model performance, providing insights into temporal considerations for model evaluation. Distributed, coupled surface‐groundwater hydrologic models are high‐dimensional, given the necessity to reflect the spatially diverse nature of complex hydrologic processes. Furthermore, inverse/inference problems involving these high‐dimensional models are naturally ill‐posed, given the limited information content of state observations that are typically assimilated. Many inversion/inference algorithms do not cope well with high dimensionality, leaving the practitioner to make subjective choices related to uncertain model inputs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of these subjective calibration choices within a formal sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, and parameters estimation (SA‐UA‐PE) framework on model testing for a surface‐subsurface hydrologic model. In doing so, we address the concepts of 'over‐parameterisation' and 'under‐parameterisation'. We completed a series of numerical experiments, testing several otherwise subjective aspects of the calibration process: (1) the number (5, 10, 15, 20) and type (soil, aquifer, land surface, channel) of calibration parameters selected); (2) the type of state observations assimilated (streamflow, groundwater head); and (3) the length of testing period (1 to 14 years), using monthly streamflow and groundwater head as testing data. The experiments were completed for models of the Winnebago River watershed (Minnesota, Iowa), (significant tile drainage) and the Nanticoke River watershed (Delaware, Maryland (significant groundwater‐channel interactions). The selected hydrologic model is SWAT+, using the gwflow module for physically based groundwater storage and flow modelling, and simulations are run for the 2000–2015 period. Through this process, we found that increasing the number of parameters from 5 to 15 improves the representation of streamflow, principally through an improvement of groundwater storage representation and baseflow generation, but minimal improvement when increasing to 20 parameters. Therefore, the SA‐UA‐PE process can be optimised based on an ideal number of parameters that yield adequate results while maintaining a lower computational burden. The method presented here can be used for any watershed, using integrated surface‐subsurface hydrologic models.

Automatic calibration of SWMM parameters based on multi-objective optimisation model

Impact Of Two Calibration Strategies On Flow Simulation In Qiantang River Basin, China

Efficient Numerical Approach for Simultaneous Calibration of Pipe Roughness Coefficients and Nodal Demands for Water Distribution Systems

A two-stage surrogate model based on ANN and AdaBoost for multi-objective parameter optimization of the Variable Infiltration Capacity model

New optimization strategies for SWMM modeling of stormwater quality applications in urban area

Exploring the Performance of Ensemble Smoothers to Calibrate Urban Drainage Models

A Stepwise Surrogate Model for Parameter Calibration of the Variable Infiltration Capacity Model: the Case of the Upper Brahmaputra, Tibet Plateau

An automatic parameter calibration method for the SWAT model in runoff simulation

Enhanced SWAT calibration through intelligent range-based parameter optimization

Multi-objective synchronous calibration and Pareto optimality of runoff and sediment parameters in an arid and semi-arid watershed

An automatic calibration framework based on the InfoWorks ICM model: the effect of multiple objectives during multiple water pollutant modeling

Calibration and validation of SWMM model in two urban catchments in Athens , Greece

Effects of single‐ and multi‐site calibration strategies on hydrological model performance and parameter sensitivity of large‐scale semi‐arid and semi‐humid watersheds

Multi-objective Approach to the Calibration of a Distributed Rainfall Runoff Model

Optimization of a SWAT model by incorporating geological information through calibration strategies

Considering flood scaling property in multi-objective calibration of the SWAT model: a case study in Zijinguan watershed, Northern China

Parameter Identification and Validation of SWMM in Simulation of Impervious Urban Land Surface Runoff

Research on Multiobjective Optimization of Sponge City Based on SWMM Model

Quantifying the Role of Calibration Strategies on Surface‐Subsurface Hydrologic Model Performance

Integration of a statistical emulator approach with the SCE-UA method for parameter optimization of a hydrological model

Basin-scale Multi-Objective Simulation-Optimization Modeling for Conjunctive Use of Surface Water and Groundwater in Northwest China