The relevance of rock shape over mass-implications for rockfall hazard assessments
Andrin Caviezel,Adrian Ringenbach,Sophia E Demmel,Claire E Dinneen,Nora Krebs,Yves Bühler,Marc Christen,Guillaume Meyrat,Andreas Stoffel,Elisabeth Hafner,Lucie A Eberhard,Daniel von Rickenbach,Kevin Simmler,Philipp Mayer,Pascal S Niklaus,Thomas Birchler,Tim Aebi,Lukas Cavigelli,Michael Schaffner,Stefan Rickli,Christoph Schnetzler,Michele Magno,Luca Benini,Perry Bartelt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25794-y
2021-09-20
Abstract:The mitigation of rapid mass movements involves a subtle interplay between field surveys, numerical modelling, and experience. Hazard engineers rely on a combination of best practices and, if available, historical facts as a vital prerequisite in establishing reproducible and accurate hazard zoning. Full-scale field tests have been performed to reinforce the physical understanding of debris flows and snow avalanches. Rockfall dynamics are - especially the quantification of energy dissipation during the complex rock-ground interaction - largely unknown. The awareness of rock shape dependence is growing, but presently, there exists little experimental basis on how rockfall hazard scales with rock mass, size, and shape. Here, we present a unique data set of induced single-block rockfall events comprising data from equant and wheel-shaped blocks with masses up to 2670 kg, quantifying the influence of rock shape and mass on lateral spreading and longitudinal runout and hence challenging common practices in rockfall hazard assessment.