Abstract:Incommensurate (IC) spin is closely entangled to superconductivity in cuprate superconductors. This study highlights that hole doping stabilizes a similar IC spin state in nickelate superconductors. Hole doping dependent spin splitting tuned competition between first‐neighbor and third‐neighbor in‐plane magnetic interactions and of their ratio are revealed to be the key ingredients for the IC spin state. The discovery of superconductivity in hole‐doped infinite‐layer nickelates has fueled intense research to identify the critical factor responsible for high‐Tc superconductivity. Magnetism and superconductivity are closely entangled, and elucidating the magnetic interactions in hole‐doped nickelates is critical for understanding the pairing mechanism. Here, these calculations based on the generalized Bloch theorem (GBT) and magnetic force theorem (MFT) consistently reveal that hole doping stabilizes an incommensurate (IC) spin state and increases the IC wave vector continuously, in a way strikingly similar to hole‐doped cuprates. Going further, a nonlinear Heisenberg model including first‐neighbor and third‐neighbor in‐plane magnetic interactions is developed. The analytical solutions successfully reproduce GBT and MFT results and reveal that the competition between the two magnetic interactions is the decisive factor for the IC magnetic transition. Eventually, by analyzing the doping‐controlled spin splitting of dx2−y2 band and orbital‐contributed exchange interactions, direct links between hole doping, magnetization, exchange constants, and magnetic order are established. This discovery of the IC spin state, new understanding of its electronic origin, and establishment of direct connection with the paring dx2−y2 electrons radically change the current understanding of the magnetic properties in hole‐doped NdNiO2 and open new perspectives for the superconducting mechanism in nickelates superconductors.

Comparative study of charge order in undoped infinite-layer nickelate superconductors

Microscopic Theory of Superconducting Phase Diagram in Infinite-Layer Nickelates

Absence of $3a_0$ Charge Density Wave Order in the Infinite Layer Nickelates

Charge ordering as the driving mechanism for superconductivity in rare-earth nickel oxides

An electronic origin of charge order in infinite-layer nickelates

Hund-Heisenberg Model in Superconducting Infinite-Layer Nickelates

Electronic structure of the parent compound of superconducting infinite-layer nickelates

Two Distinct Charge Orders in Infinite-layer PrNiO 2+δ revealed by Resonant X-ray Diffraction

Two Distinct Charge Orders in Infinite-layer PrNiO2+δ revealed by Resonant X-ray Diffraction

Atomic scale disorder and reconstruction in bulk infinite-layer nickelates lacking superconductivity

Incommensurate Magnetic Order in Hole‐Doped Infinite‐Layer Nickelate Superconductors due to Competing Magnetic Interactions

A broken translational symmetry state in an infinite-layer nickelate

Competing Incommensurate Spin Fluctuations and Magnetic Excitations in Infinite-Layer Nickelate Superconductors

Isotropic Pauli-limited superconductivity in the infinite-layer nickelate Nd0.775Sr0.225NiO2

Self-doping and the Mott-Kondo Scenario for Infinite-Layer Nickelate Superconductors

Cuprate-like Electronic Structures in Infinite-Layer Nickelates with Substantial Hole Dopings

Charge ordering in Ni$^{1+}$/Ni$^{2+}$ nickelates: La$_4$Ni$_3$O$_8$ and La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_6$

Superconductivity in the Two-Orbital Hubbard Model of Infinite-Layer Nickelates

Electronic Structure Trends Across the Rare-Earth Series in Superconducting Infinite Layer Nickelates