Abstract:Objective Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is one of the most frequently used operations for the restoration of apical support in women with uterovaginal prolapse. However, existing studies are inconclusive as to whether and which surgical access route is superior. The aim of the present meta-analysis is tentatively to compare the efficiency and the postoperative complications of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (L-USLS) and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension (V-USLS), highlighting that current evidence remains inconclusive regarding the superiority of either surgical access route. Data Sources We performed a systematic literature review of 5 major databases (Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov) from inception till April 2023. Methods of Study Selection No language restrictions were applied. All comparative studies that compared L-USLS and V-USLS for the management of women with uterovaginal prolapse were included. Tabulation, Integration, and Results Data from 6 retrospective cohort studies on 856 patients were extracted and analyzed. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool and ranged between moderate to serious. The pooled results suggest that L-USLS was associated with a potentially decreased incidence of ureteral compromise (OR, 0.19; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.89; p = .04) and seemingly lower objective (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.97; p = .04) and subjective recurrence rates (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.92; p = .03). There were no significant differences between the rates of postoperative pain from USLS sutures, postoperative pelvic hematomas, the suture exposure/granulation tissue formation, and the prolapse recurrence retreatment among the two groups. Conclusion The present meta-analysis indicates that L-USLS is possibly associated with significantly fewer ureteral compromise rates and decreased subjective and objective recurrences rates compared to V-USLS. Nevertheless, given the limitations in data quality and heterogeneity of the included studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Large-scale randomized studies are essential to more definitively determine the relative merits of the laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.

Levator Ani Avulsion in Ultrasound Increases Recurrence in Sacrospinous Fixation

Obstetric risk factors for levator ani muscle avulsion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Long-Term Outcomes (10 Years) of Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Unilateral levator avulsion increases the risk of de novo stress urinary incontinence after cystocele repair

Laparoscopic versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in women with pelvic organ prolapse. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Pelvic floor muscle injuries in women with a history of Caesarean section

Should sacrouterine plication be added to lateral suspension surgery? A prospective study

The Utility of Endovaginal Ultrasound in the Design of a Sacrospinous Ligament Anchoring Device in Patients with and Without Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Presacral–uterosacral Ligament Compound Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse

Management of levator ani avulsion: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

A New Combined Laparoscopic-Vaginal Lateral Suspension Procedure for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

2D pelvic floor ultrasound imaging in identifying levator ani muscle trauma agrees highly with 4D ultrasound imaging

Impact of levator trauma on pelvic floor muscle function

[Laparoscopic lateral suspension, another way to treat genital prolapse]

Medium-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy or Sacrohysteropexy Versus Vaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Fixationfor Middle Compartment Prolapse

Laparoscopic duplication of the uterosacral ligaments following hysterectomy for stage III–IV apical pelvic organ prolapse

Advanced Cystocele is a Risk Factor for Surgical Failure after Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: Pilot Study of 35 Cases of Severe Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Vaginal-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy (VALS) with advanced pelvic organ prolapse

A Posterior Approach To Laparoscopic Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension

OC18.02: Ultrasound‐based triage in the management of pelvic organ prolapse: long‐term surgical outcome