Abstract:Medical Decision Making, Ahead of Print. ObjectivesUtility scores associated with preference-based health-related quality-of-life instruments such as the EQ-5D-3L are reported as point estimates. In this study, we develop methods for capturing the uncertainty associated with the valuation study of the UK EQ-5D-3L that arises from the variability inherent in the underlying data, which is tacitly ignored by point estimates. We derive a new tariff that properly accounts for this and assigns a specific closed-form distribution to the utility of each of the 243 health states of the EQ-5D-3L.MethodsUsing the UK EQ-5D-3L valuation study, we used a Bayesian approach to obtain the posterior distributions of the derived utility scores. We constructed a hierarchical model that accounts for model misspecification and the responses of the survey participants to obtain Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples from the posteriors. The posterior distributions were approximated by mixtures of normal distributions under the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence as the criterion for the assessment of the approximation. We considered the Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) algorithm to estimate the parameters of the mixture distributions.ResultsWe derived an MCMC sample of total size 4,000 × 243. No evidence of nonconvergence was found. Our model was robust to changes in priors and starting values. The posterior utility distributions of the EQ-5D-3L states were summarized as 3-component mixtures of normal distributions, and the corresponding KL divergence values were low.ConclusionsOur method accounts for layers of uncertainty in valuation studies, which are otherwise ignored. Our techniques can be applied to other instruments and countries' populations.HighlightsGuidelines for health technology assessments typically require that uncertainty be accounted for in economic evaluations, but the parameter uncertainty of the regression model used in the valuation study of the health instrument is often tacitly ignored.We consider the UK valuation study of the EQ-5D-3L and construct a Bayesian model that accounts for layers of uncertainty that would otherwise be disregarded, and we derive closed-form utility distributions.The derived tariff can be used by researchers in economic evaluations, as it allows analysts to directly sample a utility value from its corresponding distribution, which reflects the associated uncertainty of the utility score.

Imprecision in the Estimation of Willingness to Pay Using Subjective Well-Being Data

Capturing Valuation Study Sampling Uncertainty in the Estimation of Health State Utility Values Using the EQ-5D-3L

A De-biased Direct Question Approach to Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay

A Comparison of the Reliability of the Take-It-Or-Leave-It and the Bidding Game Approaches to Estimating Willingness-To-Pay in A Rural Population in West Africa

Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate?

Willingness to pay: a valid and reliable measure of health state preference?

Estimating Attribute-Specific Willingness-to-Pay Values from a Health Care Contingent Valuation Study: A Best-Worst Choice Approach

Enhancing the face validity of choice experiments: A simple diagnostic check

The Variable Precision Method for Elicitation of Probability Weighting Functions.

Sensitivity to scope of water and wastewater service valuations: a meta-analysis of findings from water price reviews in Great Britain

Automatic price appraisals: why they matter and how to measure them

A simulation study to compare methods for constructing confidence intervals for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

A new subjective well-being index using anchored best-worst scaling

Valuing Insurance Against Small probability risks: A Meta-Analysis

Eliciting public preferences across health and wellbeing dimensions: An equivalent income value set for SIPHER‐7

Valuation of preference-based measures: can existing preference data be used to generate better estimates?

Reflection on modern methods: a note on variance estimation when using inverse probability weighting to handle attrition in cohort studies

Estimating risk preferences integrating insurance choices with subjective beliefs

Sensitivity analysis for inverse probability weighting estimators via the percentile bootstrap

Revisiting money and labor for valuing environmental goods and services in developing countries