High water, no marks? Biased lending after extreme weather

Nicola Garbarino,Benjamin Guin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100874
IF: 3.554
2021-06-01
Journal of Financial Stability
Abstract:<p>Policymakers have put forward proposals to ensure that banks do not underestimate long-term risks from climate change. To examine how lenders account for extreme weather, we compare matched repeat mortgage and property transactions around a severe flood event in England in 2013-14. First, lender valuations do not "mark-to-market" against local price declines. As a result valuations are biased upwards. Second, lenders do not offset this valuation bias by adjusting interest rates or loan amounts. Third, borrowers with low credit risk self-select into high flood risk areas. Overall, these results suggest that lenders do not track closely the impact of extreme weather <em>ex-post</em>, and that public flood insurance programs subsidize high income households in some areas.</p>
economics,business, finance
What problem does this paper attempt to address?