Understanding preferences for receiving health communications and information about clinical trials: a cross-sectional study among US adults

Dalia Majumdar,Diane Webb,Stephanie Parsons,Elizabeth M. Selwan-Lewis,Trisha Rettig,Emily Chastain,Winifred Obanor,Rob Birnberg,Amy Kuang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2024.2340720

2024-05-07

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract:Objective Effective health communication is critical for understanding and acting on health information. This cross-sectional study explored participants' understanding of their health condition, their preferences for receiving health communications, and their interest in receiving clinical trial results across several therapeutic areas.

medicine, general & internal, research & experimental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper aims to explore the preferences of American adults in receiving health information and clinical trial results. Specifically, the research objectives include:

1. **Understanding Health Status**: Understanding the extent to which participants comprehend their own health status.
2. **Preferences for Receiving Health Information**: Exploring participants' preferred sources of information (such as healthcare providers, internet searches, etc.) and formats of information (such as online reading materials, videos, charts, etc.).
3. **Interest in Clinical Trial Results**: Investigating participants' interest in learning about clinical trial results, particularly the specific topics they wish to be included in brief summaries (such as safety, efficacy, etc.).

### Research Methods

- **Study Design**: A cross-sectional study design was adopted.
- **Participant Recruitment**: Participants were recruited through social media, email newsletters, and patient advocacy organizations.
- **Data Collection**: Participants completed online screening questionnaires and surveys to assess their preferences for sources and formats of health information, as well as their interest in clinical trial results and levels of health literacy.
- **Focus Groups**: In-depth interviews were conducted with some participants to further explore the above topics.

### Key Findings

- **Preferences for Information Sources**: Healthcare providers were the most preferred source of information (59%), followed by internet searches (11%). Social media (5%), friends/family (3%), and email newsletters (2%) were the least preferred sources.
- **Preferences for Information Formats**: Participants preferred online reading materials the most (33%), followed by videos (28%) and charts (27%). Printed materials (14%) and audio podcasts (9%) were the least preferred formats.
- **Understanding of Health Information**: The majority of participants (68%) indicated that they understood their health status, but a significant portion still found the information difficult to understand and confusing.
- **Interest in Clinical Trial Results**: The majority of participants (85%) were interested in learning about clinical trial results, especially brief summaries on safety and efficacy (78% and 74%, respectively).

### Conclusion

Effective health communication can be achieved through various formats directly shared by healthcare providers. This helps to improve patient understanding and engagement, particularly among populations with different health statuses and levels of health literacy.