Abstract:Introduction Improved access to rehabilitation is highlighted as a key pathway to achieving the World Health Organisation's (WHO) goal of ensuring healthy lives and promoting well‐being for all (Sustainable Development Goal 3). This article is the second in a two‐part series outlining the findings from the Rehabilitation Choices study, which aimed to identify how health professionals and consumers in Australia are informed to make decisions about rehabilitation, and their experience with barriers and enablers to accessing that rehabilitation. In this study, we present the perspectives of consumers with different health conditions and a range of experiences with rehabilitation services. Methods This was a qualitative study using focus groups and semi‐structured interviews. People with self‐reported lived experience of rehabilitation and carers were recruited using maximum variation sampling. Thematic analysis of data was conducted using an inductive approach. Results Fifty‐six consumers with diverse lived experiences of rehabilitation (19–80 years, 49 patients, 7 carers) participated in focus groups and interviews to discuss how they sourced information about rehabilitation and their experiences of what made it hard or easy to access rehabilitative care to meet their needs. Four themes were produced from the data: (1) service‐centricity of options limits access, (2) access is the patient's responsibility, (3) enabling decision‐making about rehabilitation with appropriate information and (4) provision of a psychologically safe environment. Conclusions Any planned (re)design of services to improve consumer access to rehabilitation should consider the themes identified in this study. This will ensure that consumers are provided with rehabilitation options that suit their holistic and unique needs beyond consideration of their medical diagnoses, and are actively supported to navigate this access, provided with information to help them make informed choices and provided a psychologically safe environment to engage effectively with rehabilitation. Patient or Public Contribution Three consumer research partners with lived experience of rehabilitation as patients or carers were core team members. They were involved in the design and implementation of the recruitment and communications strategies, design of the interview approach and discussion guide, contributed to the interpretation and contextualisation of findings and writing of this manuscript and are included as co‐authors (A. O., T. W. and S. W.).

Empowerment through choice: the interplay of choice and control after spinal cord or brain injury

Empowerment, Communication, and Navigating Care: The Experience of Persons With Spinal Cord Injury From Acute Hospitalization to Inpatient Rehabilitation

Reclaiming Agency in Care Decisions and Barriers From the Perspectives of Individuals With Acquired Brain Injury and Their Family Members

Co-design of an intervention exploring meaning and purpose after spinal cord injury

Controlled choice, not choice and control: Families' reflections after one year using the National Disability Insurance Scheme

P.175 An exploration of the evolving perception of quality of life from the perspective of individuals living with a cervical spinal cord injury in Nova Scotia

A qualitative assessment of psychosocial aspects that play a role in bladder management after spinal cord injury

Co-designing for behavioural change: understanding barriers and enablers to addressing sexuality after traumatic brain injury and mapping intervention strategies in a multi-disciplinary rehabilitation unit

Exploring Consumer Experiences of Barriers and Enablers to Accessing Rehabilitation That Meets Their Needs: The Rehabilitation Choices Study, Part 2—Consumer Perspectives

Learning to direct one's care: barriers and facilitators reported by people with tetraplegia

Is Self-Efficacy Related to the Quality of Life in Elite Athletes after Spinal Cord Injury?

Enacting an “Empowerment Approach” After Sexual Assault

Do They Have a Choice? Surrogate Decision-Making After Severe Acute Brain Injury

Toward a person‐centered ethics framework for autonomy in spinal cord injury research and rehabilitation

Trauma-informed physiotherapy and the principles of safety, trustworthiness, choice, collaboration, and empowerment: a qualitative study

Re-building relationships after a spinal cord injury: experiences of family caregivers and care recipients

Self-Determination for Persons with Disabilities: Choice, Risk, and Dignity

"It's Not, Can You Do This? It's... How Do You Feel About Doing This?" A Critical Discourse Analysis of Sexuality Support After Spinal Cord Injury

Purpose in Life of Elite Athletes after Spinal Cord Injury

Improving Outcomes in People with Spinal Cord Injury: Encouraging Results from a Multidisciplinary Advanced Rehabilitation Pathway

The perceived benefits and barriers of sport in spinal cord injured individuals: a qualitative study