The applicability of the central line‐associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria for the evaluation of bacteremia episodes in pediatric oncology patients

Ceder H. van den Bosch,Florine N. J. Frakking,Yvette G. T. Loeffen,Harm van Tinteren,Alida F. W. van der Steeg,Marc H. W. A. Wijnen,Marianne D. van de Wetering,Jan‐Tom van der Bruggen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14175
2024-02-01
European Journal Of Haematology
Abstract:Background The aim of this study was to investigate the applicability of the central line‐associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in pediatric oncology patients. Methods Bacteremia episodes from 2020 to 2022 from a prospective cohort of pediatric oncology patients with a central venous catheter were included. Episodes were classified by three medical experts following the CLABSI criteria as either a CLABSI or non‐CLABSI (i.e., contamination, other infection source, or mucosal barrier injury‐laboratory confirmed bloodstream infection (MBI‐LCBI)). Subsequently, they were asked if and why they (dis)agreed with this diagnosis following the criteria. The primary outcome was the percentage of episodes where the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis given following the CLABSI criteria. Results Overall, 84 bacteremia episodes in 71 patients were evaluated. Following the CLABSI criteria, 34 (40%) episodes were classified as CLABSIs and 50 (60%) as non‐CLABSIs. In 11 (13%) cases the experts clinically disagreed with the diagnosis following the CLABSI criteria. The discrepancy between the CLABSI criteria and clinical diagnosis was significant; McNemar's test p
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?