Positive Effect Of Financial Incentive On Radiologist Compliance With Quality Metric Placement In Knee Radiograph Reports

Oganes Ashikyan,Shuda Xia,Osama Faridi,Jessica H. Porembka,Avneesh Chhabra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.01.010
IF: 6.24
2024-01-31
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Abstract:Purpose Ongoing quality improvement (QI) processes in our department include insertion of a Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis (OA) grade template in knee radiograph reports to decrease unnecessary MR imaging. However, uniform adoption of this grading system is lacking. Department-wide financial incentives were instituted to improve compliance with QI metrics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a financial incentive on KL grading system usage and to compare compliance rates of musculoskeletal (MSK) radiologists to general radiologists who were not financially incentivized to use KL grading. Materials and Methods Percentages of all knee radiograph reports containing KL grading with standardized follow-up recommendations were determined by querying our departmental radiology database before and after introduction of the new quality-based financial incentive. Pre-incentive compliance rates for MSK and general radiologists were compared to an adoption period, and two separate 6-month post-incentive periods. Results In total, 52,673 reports were retrospectively analyzed for KL grading usage (41,670 reports interpreted by MSK radiologists and 11,003 interpreted by general radiologists). Increase in compliance was greatest among MSK radiologist's reports during the incentivized adoption period (36.1% to 53.2%). This improvement was sustained among MSK radiologists and averaged 62.7% during the most recently studied post-implementation period. A lesser degree of improvement in compliance was observed in non-incentivized general radiologists' reports (19.3 to 27.5%); during the post-implementation follow-up period, their compliance decreased to 26.5%. Conclusion Introduction of a financial incentive results in significantly increased adoption of QI practices with sustained improvement among incentivized MSK radiologists compared to non-incentivized general radiologists.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?