Isolated fetal umbilical vein varix and the association with intrauterine fetal death and fetal growth restriction: A systematic review, meta‐analysis, and nested retrospective cohort study

Ian Koorn,Hanna Heinrich,Anne Nelissen,Nerissa Denswil,Ingeborg H. Linskens,Charlotte H. J. R. Jansen,Esther W. Wortelboer,Eva Pajkrt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6538
2024-03-20
Prenatal Diagnosis
Abstract:Objectives To assess the risk of intrauterine fetal death (IUFD) and fetal growth restriction (FGR) in fetuses with an isolated fetal intra‐abdominal umbilical vein varix (i‐FIUVV). Methods A retrospective cohort study combined with a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature was performed. In the retrospective cohort study, all singleton fetuses with an i‐FIUVV in the fetal medicine units of the Amsterdam UMC (between 2007 and 2023) were analyzed. The primary outcome measures were IUFD and FGR. The sample proportions of IUFD and FGR were depicted as risk percentages. The IUFD proportion was compared to the regional reference population and the FGR proportion was compared to the reported proportions in Europe. The secondary outcome measures were gestational age at diagnosis, initial and maximal FIUVV diameter, fetal monitoring in pregnancy, turbulent flow in the varix, thrombus formation in the varix, induction of labor, gestational age at birth, and birthweight centile. The proportion of fetuses with a birthweight below the 10th centile was compared with that of the regional reference population. The systematic review included all cases from eligible literature published between 2007 and 2023 supplemented by the data of our retrospective cohort study. In the systematic review and meta‐analysis, the pooled proportions of IUFD and FGR were assessed in fetuses with i‐FIUVV. Results The retrospective cohort included 43 singletons with an i‐FIUVV. The IUFD risk was 0% [Confidence Interval, CI: 0%–8.2%], which did not differ significantly from 0.3% in the reference population, p = 1.0. The risk of FGR was 16.3% [CI: 6.8%–30.7%] in the studied population, which is higher than the reported incidence of FGR in Europe ranging from 5%–10%. The proportion of fetuses with birthweights below the 10th centile was higher in our cohort compared with the reference population (23.3 vs. 9.9%, p
genetics & heredity,obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?