How does the environmental protection tax law affect firm ESG? Evidence from the Chinese stock markets

Yu He,Xiaoling Zhao,Huan Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107067
IF: 12.8
2023-09-27
Energy Economics
Abstract:The serious environmental pollution problem has been proven to harm people's health and economic development in China. Chinese authorities implemented the Environmental Protection Tax Law (EPTL) in 2018—the first environmental tax law in this country—to solve the problem. Since firms are main objects of this policy, its effect on firms' sustainable development capacity is a worthwhile but not yet discussed question. Therefore, this study adopts the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) to quantify firms' sustainable development capacity and employs the difference-in-differences method to investigate the above research question using a sample of A shares listed in Chinese stock markets from 2014 to 2021. Benchmark regression and robustness tests demonstrated that the EPTL could promote heavily polluting firms' ESG, thus, confirming the Porter hypothesis' existence in China from a micro perspective. We conducted a series of additional tests to provide insight into the effects of the EPTL under different circumstances, and achieved the following important findings: a) although a time-lag effect exists, the policy effect increases over time; b) the boosting effect of this policy is stronger on higher ESG firms than on lower ESG firms; c) innovation compensation effect and government financial subsidies can exponentially increase the EPTL's effect on firm ESG; and d) this policy has an inhibiting effect on politically connected firm's ESG. Based on these findings, we provide theoretical and practical suggestions for academia and policymakers. The Chinese authorities should insist on enforcing the EPTL in the long run, encourage firms on research and development investments, and provide them more financial subsidies, so as to enhance the policy's effect. Moreover, the government should implement some supporting policies to improve the sustainable development capacity of politically connected firms.
economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? This paper primarily explores the impact of China's "Environmental Protection Tax Law" (EPTL) on corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance. Specifically, the study employs the Difference-in-Differences (DID) method, using panel data from A-share companies listed on the Chinese stock market from 2014 to 2021, to examine the effect of EPTL on corporate sustainability. #### Main Research Questions: 1. **Does EPTL significantly affect corporate ESG performance?** 2. **What are the specific impacts of EPTL on the three aspects of Environment (E), Social (S), and Governance (G)?** #### Research Findings: - **Overall ESG Improvement**: The results indicate that EPTL significantly enhances the ESG performance of heavily polluting enterprises, validating the Porter Hypothesis at the micro level in China. - **Significant Improvement in Environmental and Social Indicators**: EPTL has a significant positive impact on the Environmental (E) and Social (S) aspects, but its impact on Governance (G) is not significant. - **Long-term Effects**: The policy effects gradually strengthen over time, showing long-term positive outcomes. - **Differences in Impact on Enterprises with Different ESG Levels**: For enterprises with higher ESG levels, the promoting effect of EPTL is more significant. - **Role of R&D Investment and Government Subsidies**: Research and Development (R&D) investment and Government Subsidies (GSF) can significantly enhance the positive impact of EPTL on ESG. - **Impact on Politically Connected Enterprises**: EPTL has an inhibitory effect on the ESG performance of politically connected enterprises. #### Practical Implications: - The government should persist in the long-term implementation of EPTL to enhance policy effectiveness. - Encourage enterprises to increase R&D investment and provide more financial subsidies. - For politically connected enterprises, the government should formulate supporting policies to improve their sustainability.