Machine learning-derived analysis of intensive care unit mortality in patients with ICU acquired infections

Naeimehossadat Asmarian,Farid Zand,Golnar Sabetian,Mansoor Masjedi,Hosein Haddadbakhodaei,Reza Nikandishnobar,Javad Fallahi,Armin Amirian,Elham Shafiei,Victor D. Rosenthal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154746
IF: 4.298
2024-04-01
Journal of Critical Care
Abstract:Introduction and aim ICU acquired infections are the most common infectious causes of death. Analysis of factors associated with mortality related to these infections using machine learning (ML) algorithms can be useful for both individual risk stratification and quality of care, however, these studies are scarce in ICU settings. We aimed to examine different ML models to find the most relevant factors associated with mortality in patients with ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP), central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) and catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Patients and methods The source database used for model development and validation was based on the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). Data were collected prospectively from February 2014 to June 2021 in 9 adult medical and surgical ICU's in Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz, Iran. Every patient with any episodes of VAP, CLABSI and CAUTI was recruited. A total of 17 important predictor variables including demographics, type of admission and major ICU measures were used. We employed the random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM) and the traditional logistic regression (LR) method to develop prediction models. In addition, the prediction performance of the three developed models was evaluated and compared. Results The records from 968 patients were used for model training and test. Amongst them, 317 (32.7%) patients had in-ICU death. The average AUROCs of the RF, GBM and LR models were 0.77, 0.77 and 0.74 respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the RF, GBM, and LR were (0.65, 0.77), (0.79, 0.62) and (0.74, 0.67), respectively. The Brier scores of the RF, GBM and LR models were 0.111, 0.105 and 0.114, respectively. The calibration plots showed that the RF had better calibration than GBM and LR models. Conclusions The machine learning-based models developed in this study had good prediction performance. Amongst them, the GBM model showed the best performance in predicting the risk of in-ICU death. It has the potential to assist physicians in the ICU to perform appropriate clinical interventions for critically ill patients with ICU acquired catheter related infections and thus may help to improve the management of patients with these infections in the ICU.
critical care medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?