Abstract:Background: Sclerosing adenosis (SA) is a common proliferative benign lesion without atypia in the breast that may mimic invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) on medical imaging, leading to it often being misdiagnosed and mistreated. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound imaging in distinguishing SA from IDC.Methods: Multimodal ultrasound imaging, including automated breast volume scan (ABVS), elasticity imaging (EI), and color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI), were performed on 120 consecutive patients comprising 122 breast lesions (54 SA, 68 IDC). All lesions were pathologically confirmed. Multimodal ultrasound imaging features were compared between the two groups. Binary logistic regression analysis based on ABVS, EI, and CDFI was conducted to formulate a logistic regression equation for differentiating SA from IDC. The diagnostic performances of ABVS, EI, CDFI, and their combination were compared by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ABVS, EI, CDFI, and their combination in differentiating SA from IDC were, respectively, 75.00%, 72.22%, and 73.77%; 86.76%, 72.22%, and 80.33%; 73.53%, 64.81%, and 69.67%; and 88.24%, 74.07%, and 81.97%. Combining multimodal ultrasound imaging yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.895 (95% confidence interval: 0.827-0.943), which was higher than that of ABVS, EI, and CDFI, with AUC values of 0.736, 0.795, and 0.692, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (ABVS vs. combined model, P<0.001; CDFI vs. combined model, P<0.001; EI vs. combined model, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic efficacy among the three imaging modalities (ABVS vs. EI, P=0.266; ABVS vs. CDFI, P=0.4671; EI vs. CDFI, P=0.051). Compared with those in IDC, the calcification (16.67% vs. 57.35%; P<0.001) and retraction phenomena in the coronal planes (18.52% vs. 57.35%; P<0.001) were less common in patients with SA, while circumscribed margin (38.89% vs. 5.88%; P<0.001), vascularity grade 0-I (64.81% vs. 26.47%; P<0.001), and elasticity scores 1-3 (72.22% vs. 13.24%; P<0.001) were more frequently found in patients with SA. Patients with SA were significantly younger than were patients with IDC (43±11 vs. 54±11 years; P<0.001), and the lesion size was smaller in patients with SA than in those with IDC (median size 1.0 cm; interquartile range (IQR), 0.9 cm vs. median size 1.3 cm; IQR, 1.3 cm; P<0.001).Conclusions: The preliminary results suggested that multimodal ultrasound imaging can improve the diagnostic accuracy of SA and provide additional information for differential diagnosis of SA and IDC.

EP23.16: Diagnostic accuracy of modified benign descriptor three in the diagnosis of simple cysts and cystadenomas

EP23.21: Diagnostic accuracy of modified benign descriptor two in the diagnosis of teratomas

OP06.05: Diagnostic accuracy of modified benign descriptor one in the diagnosis of endometriomas

EP23.40: Experience with the modified benign descriptor four in the diagnosis of unclassified benign adnexal masses

EP23.63: Serous multilocular cystadenoma in a 12‐year‐old patient: a case report

Ultrnsonographic Observation of Fetal Adrenal Cystic Lesions

EP23.19: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scoring systems in differentiating benign versus malignant adnexal masses

Simple adnexal cysts diagnosed by ultrasound in postmenopausal women

Three-dimensional sonographic morphologic assessment in complex adnexal masses: preliminary experience

EP23.27: Female adnexal tumour of probable Wolffian origin: ultrasonographic imaging characteristics

Imaging in gynecological disease (16): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous cystadenofibromas in adnexa

Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic cysts. Usefulness of intracystic tumor markers (CEA and CA 19.9.)

EP23.14: Diagnostic accuracy of adnexal malignancy assessment models ADNEX and simple rules when applied by individuals with no prior clinical experience

EP34.17: Preoperative assessment of myometrial infiltration low‐risk endometrial cancer by 3D transvaginal ultrasound

Application of Ultrasound Scores (Subjective Assessment, Simple Rules Risk Assessment, ADNEX Model, O-RADS) to Adnexal Masses of Difficult Classification

EP05.36: Association of prenatal conatal cysts with structural and genetic anomalies

OP17.04: Validation of the revised MUSA criteria for sonographic detection of adenomyosis

Multimodal ultrasound imaging for diagnostic differentiation of sclerosing adenosis from invasive ductal carcinoma

OP17.06: Diagnosing adenomyosis using transvaginal contrast‐enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study

EP23.37: Ultrasonography experience may not be a reliable indicator for improved accuracy in assessing malignancy in adnexal tumours using the ADNEX model

Role of 3-Dimensional Sonography in the Assessment of Submucous Fibroids: A Pilot Study