The use of artificial tears among the danish population: Epidemiological observations

Simone Ahrensberg,Jens Rovelt Andreasen,Miriam Kolko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15998
2024-01-01
Acta Ophthalmologica
Abstract:Aims/Purpose: To investigate the use of artificial tears (AT), identify which eye diseases are most prevalent among the users, determine which products are preferred by the population, and analyse their preservative content. Methods: Data originate from the FOREVER questionnaire. Respondents are customers from Synoptik A/S aged from 18 years and of both genders, and have given written consent for the use of their data. All 48 AT in the questionnaire appear in The Nordic Guidelines Dry Eye Disease 2022. T ‐test and chi 2 were performed to examine significant differences in the data. Results: 41.723 participants had answered the questionnaire, 15.613 men and 26.110 women, with a mean age of 55.4 (15.0) years. 10.1% reported having an eye disease diagnosed by a doctor, the most prevalent being cataract, then glaucoma, vitreous detachment and age‐related macular degeneration (AMD). 5129 (12.3%) used AT. This subpopulation consisted of 1268 men and 3861 women with a mean age of 61.2 (14.8) years. 21.8% had an eye disease diagnosed by a doctor. The most prevalent eye disease remained cataract, then glaucoma, vitreous detachment and AMD. Thealoz Duo (preservative free (PF)) was the most used brand, then Systane Ultra (PF or PolyQuad 0.001%) and Viscous Eye Drops (benzalkonium chloride (BAK) 0.011%). It was possible to identify 2560 respondents using a PF product and 874 using a product with a preservative. The mean age was significantly higher among those using AT, compared with those who did not use AT (54.6 ± 14.8 years) with p < 2.2·10 −16 . Also, a significant distribution between eye disease and the use of AT was found ( p < 2.2·10 −16 ). Conclusions: Around 12% of the population used AT. Their mean age was significantly higher than those not using AT (61.2 years compared to 54.6 with p < 2.2·10 −16 ) and the prevalence of eye disease was also significantly higher (21.8% compared to 10.1%, p < 2.2·10 −16 ), but the four most common eye diseases was similar in both groups.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?