The Limits of Data

C. Thi Nguyen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58875/luxd6515

2024-01-01

Issues in science and technology

Abstract:Data is powerful because it’s universal. The cost is context.

engineering, industrial, multidisciplinary,multidisciplinary sciences,social issues

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

What We Talk About When We Talk About Data Physicality

Dietmar Offenhuber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2020.3024146

IF: 1.909

2020-11-01

IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications

Abstract:Data physicalizations "map data to physical form," yet many canonical examples are not based on external data sets. To address this contradiction, I argue that the practice of physicalization forces us to rethink traditional notions of data. This article proposes a conceptual framework to examine how physicalizations relate to data. This article develops a two-dimensional conceptual space for comparing different perspectives on data used in physicalization, drawing from design theory and critical data studies literature. One axis distinguishes between epistemological and ontological perspectives, focusing on the relationship between data and the mind. The second axis distinguishes how data relate to the world, differentiating between representational and relational perspectives. To clarify the aesthetic and conceptual implications of these different perspectives, the article discusses examples of data physicalization for each quadrant of the continuous space. It further uses the framework to examine the explicit and implicit assumptions about data in physicalization literature. As a theoretical article, it encourages practitioners to think about how data relate to the manifestations and the phenomena they try to capture. It invites exploration of the relationship between data and the world as a generative source of creative tension.

computer science, software engineering
The Promise and Prejudice of Big Data in Intelligence Community

Karan Jani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.08629

2016-10-27

Computers and Society

Abstract:Big data holds critical importance in the current generation of information technology, with applications ranging from financial, industrial, academic to defense sectors. With the exponential rise of open source data from social media and increasing government monitoring, big data is now also linked with national security, and subsequently to the intelligence community. In this study I review the scope of big data sciences in the functioning of intelligence community. The major part of my study focuses on the inherent limitations of big data, which affects the intelligence agencies from gathering of information to anticipating surprises. The limiting factors range from technical to ethical issues connected with big data. My study concludes the need of experts with domain knowledge from intelligence community to efficiently guide big data analysis for timely filling the knowledge gaps. As a case study on limitations of using big data, I narrate some of the ongoing work in nuclear intelligence using simple analytics and argue on why big data analysis in that case would lead to unnecessary complications. For further investigation, I highlight cases of crowdsource forecasting tournaments and predicting unrest from social media.
The Dimensions of Data Labor: A Road Map for Researchers, Activists, and Policymakers to Empower Data Producers

Hanlin Li,Nicholas Vincent,Stevie Chancellor,Brent Hecht

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594070

2023-05-23

Abstract:Many recent technological advances (e.g. ChatGPT and search engines) are possible only because of massive amounts of user-generated data produced through user interactions with computing systems or scraped from the web (e.g. behavior logs, user-generated content, and artwork). However, data producers have little say in what data is captured, how it is used, or who it benefits. Organizations with the ability to access and process this data, e.g. OpenAI and Google, possess immense power in shaping the technology landscape. By synthesizing related literature that reconceptualizes the production of data for computing as ``data labor'', we outline opportunities for researchers, policymakers, and activists to empower data producers in their relationship with tech companies, e.g advocating for transparency about data reuse, creating feedback channels between data producers and companies, and potentially developing mechanisms to share data's revenue more broadly. In doing so, we characterize data labor with six important dimensions - legibility, end-use awareness, collaboration requirement, openness, replaceability, and livelihood overlap - based on the parallels between data labor and various other types of labor in the computing literature.

Computers and Society
Big Data in Organizations

Jörg Raab,Yuting Pang,Joan Baaijens,Honggeng Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2024.100454

IF: 3.3

2024-01-01

Big Data Research

Abstract:Digital technology has rapidly been transforming how organizations operate. However, the literature in management studies has only just started to problematize the fundamental inter-relation of digital technology and organizing and we lack sound data about the actual breadth and depth of these changes. This study therefore explores the state of the implementation of Big Data applications in a wide range of organizations in China and the Netherlands and the impact on organizational structures and processes. Our findings show that most organizations are still in an experimental phase at best. We can therefore observe an evolutionary model of technology adoption
Super-reflective Data: Speculative Imaginings of a World Where Data Works for People

Max Van Kleek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.05026

IF: 6.4588

2020-03-10

Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract:It's the year 2020, and every space and place on- and off-line has been augmented with digital things that observe, record, transmit, and compute, for the purposes of recording endless data traces of what is happening in the world. Individually, these things (and the invisible services the power them) have reached considerable sophistication in their ability to analyse and dissect such observations, turning streams of audio and video into informative data fragments. Yet somehow, individuals as end-users of platforms and services have not seen the full potential of such data. In this speculative paper, we propose two hypothetical mini scenarios different from our current digital world. In the former, instead of hoarding it, data controllers turn captured data over to those who need it as quickly as possible, working together to combine, validate, and refine it for maximum usefulness. This simultaneously addresses the data fragmentation and privacy problem, by handing over long-term data governance to those that value it the most In the latter, we discuss ethical dilemmas using the long-term use of such rich data and its tendency to cause people to relentlessly optimise.
Thinking About Data With Grounded Theory

Kathy Charmaz,Linda Liska Belgrave

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418809455

IF: 1.789

2018-11-14

Qualitative Inquiry

Abstract:This article examines qualitative data in an era of neoliberalism and focuses on the place of data in grounded theory studies. Neoliberal values of individual responsibility, self-sufficiency, competition, efficiency, and profit have entered the conduct of research. Neoliberalism fosters (a) reifying quantitative logical-deductive research, (b) imposing surveillance of types and sources of data, (c) marginalizing inductive qualitative research, and (d) limiting access to data in grounded theory studies. Grounded theory relies on data and resists current efforts to abandon data. The method resides in the space between reifying and rejecting data. Data allow us to learn from the stories of those left out and permits research participants to break silences. Data can help us look underneath and beyond our privileges, and alter our views. Grounded theory is predicated on data, but how researchers regard and render data depends on which version of the method they adopt. We propose developing a strong methodological self-consciousness to learn how we affect the research process and to counter the subtle effects of neoliberalism.

social sciences, interdisciplinary
Technical Perspective: Graph Theory for Data Privacy: A New Approach for Complex Data Flows

Elena Ferrari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3665252.3665264

2024-05-14

ACM SIGMOD Record

Abstract:Nearly all of the world's population now uses online services that request personal information, covering almost every aspect of our lives. The abundance of personal data in digital form has brought incredible benefits to end users, enabling them to access personalized and advanced services based on the analysis of the data collected. This capability has dramatically improved the user experience in various application domains, ranging from healthcare to e-commerce, finance, logistics, and entertainment, to name a few. Numerous technological advancements in the field of big data have enabled this massive processing of personal data, and recent advances in AI data processing capabilities will expand the ways in which service providers will use personal data in the coming years. Machine learning algorithms, powered by AI, will be used to make increasingly accurate predictions about user behavior by uncovering hidden correlations within massive data sets. There is therefore a tension between the desire to fully exploit personal data in such ecosystems and the need to provide strong privacy and transparency guarantees to the individuals whose data is being exploited. Privacy protection is further complicated because data processing is typically not performed in isolation but through pipelines of different services, with each step making inferences about the personal data consumed by the services in subsequent steps.

computer science, information systems, software engineering
Data Explosion, Data Nature and Dataology

Yangyong Zhu,Ning Zhong,Yun Xiong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04954-5_25

2009-01-01

Abstract:The essence of computer applications is to store things in the real world into computer systems in the form of data, i.e., it is a process of producing data. Some data are the records related to culture and society, and others are the descriptions of phenomena of universe and life. The large scale of data is rapidly generated and stored in computer systems, which is called data explosion. Data explosion forms data nature in computer systems. To explore data nature, new theories and methods are required. In this paper, we present the concept of data nature and introduce the problems arising from data nature, and then we define a new discipline named dataology (also called data science or science of data), which is an umbrella of theories, methods and technologies for studying data nature. The research issues and framework of dataology are proposed.
Big Data and Its Exclusions

Jonas Lerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2293765

2013-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Legal debates over the "big data" revolution currently focus on the risks of inclusion: the privacy and civil liberties consequences of being swept up in big data's net. This essay takes a different approach, focusing on the risks of exclusion: the threats big data poses to those whom it overlooks. Millions of people worldwide remain on big data's periphery. Their information is not regularly collected or analyzed, because they do not routinely engage in the sorts of behaviors big data is designed to capture. Consequently, their preferences and needs risk being routinely ignored when governments and private industry use big data and advanced analytics to shape public policy and the marketplace. Because big data poses a unique threat to equality, not just privacy, this essay argues that a new "data antisubordination" doctrine may be needed.
Less (Data) Is More: Why Small Data Holds the Key to the Future of Artificial Intelligence

Ciro Greco,Andrea Polonioli,Jacopo Tagliabue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.10424

2019-07-22

Abstract:The claims that big data holds the key to enterprise successes and that Artificial Intelligence is going to replace humanity have become increasingly more popular over the past few years, both in academia and in the industry. However, while these claims may indeed capture some truth, they have also been massively oversold, or so we contend here. The goal of this paper is two-fold. First, we provide a qualified defence of the value of less data within the context of AI. This is done by carefully reviewing two distinct problems for big data driven AI, namely a) the limited track record of Deep Learning in key areas such as Natural Language Processing, b) the regulatory and business significance of being able to learn from few data points. Second, we briefly sketch what we refer to as a case of AI with humans and for humans, namely an AI paradigm whereby the systems we build are privacy-oriented and focused on human-machine collaboration, not competition. Combining our claims above, we conclude that when seen through the lens of cognitively inspired AI, the bright future of the discipline is about less data, not more, and more humans, not fewer.

Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence
Security implications of digitalization: The dangers of data colonialism and the way towards sustainable and sovereign management of environmental data

Matthias Stürmer,Jasmin Nussbaumer,Pascal Stöckli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.01662

2021-07-04

Computers and Society

Abstract:Digitalization opens up new opportunities in the collection, analysis, and presentation of data which can contribute to the achievement of the 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). In particular, the access to and control of environmental and geospatial data is fundamental to identify and understand global issues and trends. Also immediate crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrate the importance of accurate health data such as infection statistics and the relevance of digital tools like video conferencing platforms. However, today much of the data is collected and processed by private actors. Thus, governments and researchers depend on data platforms and proprietary systems of big tech companies such as Google or Microsoft. The market capitalization of the seven largest US and Chinese big tech companies has grown to 8.7tn USD in recent years, about twice the size of Germany's gross domestic product (GDP). Therefore, their market power is enormous, allowing them to dictate many rules of the digital space and even interfere with legislations. Based on a literature review and nine expert interviews this study presents a framework that identifies the risks and consequences along the workflow of collecting, processing, storing, using of data. It also includes solutions that governmental and multilateral actors can strive for to alleviate the risks. Fundamental to this framework is the novel concept of "data colonialism" which describes today's trend of private companies appropriating the digital sphere. Historically, colonial nations used to grab indigenous land and exploit the cheap labor of slave workers. In a similar way, today's big tech corporations use cheap data of their users to produce valuable services and thus create enormous market power.
Big Data:Yesterday,Today,Tomorrow

XUEYibo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6868.2014.03.009

2014-01-01

Abstract:This paper analyzes the reasons that big data is generated. It then describes big data in terms of effects, value, and issues. Now, big data is opening a new era of development and presents good opportunities. The science and social values of big data focus on two aspects. On the one hand, big data can discover explicit laws and also dig up implicit laws and potential value. On the other hand, big data can be changed into the fountain of economic value and shake al aspects of the world.
Human-Data Interaction: Thinking beyond individual datasets

Laura Koesten,Jude Yew,Kathleen Gregory

2024-10-20

Abstract:Having greater access to data leads to many benefits, from advancing science to promoting accountability in government to boosting innovation. However, merely providing data access does not make data easy to use; even when data is openly available online, people may struggle to work with it. In this article, we draw on prior work, including our own, and a case study of Kaggle (a large online data science community) to discuss the importance of moving away from viewing datasets as static resources. Instead, we describe the view of data as a process with its own interactional affordances that offer many different possibilities for data, as well as for social interaction. We advocate for the notion of Human Data Interactions and their potential implications for various audiences.

Human-Computer Interaction
Datalism and Data Monopolies in the Era of A.I.: A Research Agenda

Catherine E.A. Mulligan,Phil Godsiff

2023-07-16

Abstract:The increasing use of data in various parts of the economic and social systems is creating a new form of monopoly: data monopolies. We illustrate that the companies using these strategies, Datalists, are challenging the existing definitions used within Monopoly Capital Theory (MCT). Datalists are pursuing a different type of monopoly control than traditional multinational corporations. They are pursuing monopolistic control over data to feed their productive processes, increasingly controlled by algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AI). These productive processes use information about humans and the creative outputs of humans as the inputs but do not classify those humans as employees, so they are not paid or credited for their labour. This paper provides an overview of this evolution and its impact on monopoly theory. It concludes with an outline for a research agenda for economics in this space.

General Economics,Human-Computer Interaction
Reviving Purpose Limitation and Data Minimisation in Data-Driven Systems

Asia J. Biega,Michèle Finck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2101.06203

2021-01-15

Computers and Society

Abstract:This paper determines whether the two core data protection principles of data minimisation and purpose limitation can be meaningfully implemented in data-driven systems. While contemporary data processing practices appear to stand at odds with these principles, we demonstrate that systems could technically use much less data than they currently do. This observation is a starting point for our detailed techno-legal analysis uncovering obstacles that stand in the way of meaningful implementation and compliance as well as exemplifying unexpected trade-offs which emerge where data protection law is applied in practice. Our analysis seeks to inform debates about the impact of data protection on the development of artificial intelligence in the European Union, offering practical action points for data controllers, regulators, and researchers.
Learning to Limit Data Collection via Scaling Laws: A Computational Interpretation for the Legal Principle of Data Minimization

Divya Shanmugam,Samira Shabanian,Fernando Diaz,Michèle Finck,Asia Biega

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.08096

2022-06-13

Abstract:Modern machine learning systems are increasingly characterized by extensive personal data collection, despite the diminishing returns and increasing societal costs of such practices. Yet, data minimisation is one of the core data protection principles enshrined in the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation ('GDPR') and requires that only personal data that is adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary is processed. However, the principle has seen limited adoption due to the lack of technical interpretation. In this work, we build on literature in machine learning and law to propose FIDO, a Framework for Inhibiting Data Overcollection. FIDO learns to limit data collection based on an interpretation of data minimization tied to system performance. Concretely, FIDO provides a data collection stopping criterion by iteratively updating an estimate of the performance curve, or the relationship between dataset size and performance, as data is acquired. FIDO estimates the performance curve via a piecewise power law technique that models distinct phases of an algorithm's performance throughout data collection separately. Empirical experiments show that the framework produces accurate performance curves and data collection stopping criteria across datasets and feature acquisition algorithms. We further demonstrate that many other families of curves systematically overestimate the return on additional data. Results and analysis from our investigation offer deeper insights into the relevant considerations when designing a data minimization framework, including the impacts of active feature acquisition on individual users and the feasability of user-specific data minimization. We conclude with practical recommendations for the implementation of data minimization.

Machine Learning,Computers and Society,Information Retrieval
Data, Science and Society

Claudio Gutierrez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.07029

2017-07-22

Abstract:Reflections on the Concept of Data and its Implications for Science and Society

Digital Libraries
Data-Driven Dystopia: an uninterrupted breach of ethics

Shreyansh Padarha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.07934

2023-05-13

Abstract:This article discusses the risks and complexities associated with the exponential rise in data and the misuse of data by large corporations. The article presents instances of data breaches and data harvesting practices that violate user privacy. It also explores the concept of "Weapons Of Math Destruction" (WMDs), which refers to big data models that perpetuate inequality and discrimination. The article highlights the need for companies to take responsibility for safeguarding user information and the ethical use of data models, AI, and ML. The article also emphasises the significance of data privacy for individuals in their daily lives and the need for a more conscious and responsible approach towards data management.

Computers and Society,Cryptography and Security
Data as an economic good, data as a commons, and data governance

Nadya Purtova,Gijs van Maanen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2265270

2023-11-02

Law Innovation and Technology

Abstract:This paper provides a systematic and critical review of the economics literature on data as an economic good and draws lessons for data governance. We conclude that focusing on data as an economic good in governance efforts is hardwired to only result in more data production and cannot deliver other societal goals contrary to what is often claimed in the literature and policy. Data governance is often a red herring which distracts from other digital problems. The governance of digital society cannot rely exclusively on data-centric economic models. We review the literatures and the underlying empirical and political claims concerning data commons. While commons thinking is useful to frame digital problems in terms of ecologies, it has important limitations. We propose a political-ecological approach to governing the digital society, defined by ecological thinking about governance problems and the awareness of the political nature of framing the problems and mapping their ecological makeup.
When the Body Became Data: Historical Data Cultures and Anatomical Illustration

Michael Correll,Laura A. Garrison

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.05014

2024-02-08

Abstract:With changing attitudes around knowledge, medicine, art, and technology, the human body has become a source of information and, ultimately, shareable and analyzable data. Centuries of illustrations and visualizations of the body occur within particular historical, social, and political contexts. These contexts are enmeshed in different so-called data cultures: ways that data, knowledge, and information are conceptualized and collected, structured and shared. In this work, we explore how information about the body was collected as well as the circulation, impact, and persuasive force of the resulting images. We show how mindfulness of data cultural influences remain crucial for today's designers, researchers, and consumers of visualizations. We conclude with a call for the field to reflect on how visualizations are not timeless and contextless mirrors on objective data, but as much a product of our time and place as the visualizations of the past.

Human-Computer Interaction,Computers and Society

The Limits of Data

What We Talk About When We Talk About Data Physicality

The Promise and Prejudice of Big Data in Intelligence Community

The Dimensions of Data Labor: A Road Map for Researchers, Activists, and Policymakers to Empower Data Producers

Big Data in Organizations

Super-reflective Data: Speculative Imaginings of a World Where Data Works for People

Thinking About Data With Grounded Theory

Technical Perspective: Graph Theory for Data Privacy: A New Approach for Complex Data Flows

Data Explosion, Data Nature and Dataology

Big Data and Its Exclusions

Less (Data) Is More: Why Small Data Holds the Key to the Future of Artificial Intelligence

Security implications of digitalization: The dangers of data colonialism and the way towards sustainable and sovereign management of environmental data

Big Data:Yesterday,Today,Tomorrow

Human-Data Interaction: Thinking beyond individual datasets

Datalism and Data Monopolies in the Era of A.I.: A Research Agenda

Reviving Purpose Limitation and Data Minimisation in Data-Driven Systems

Learning to Limit Data Collection via Scaling Laws: A Computational Interpretation for the Legal Principle of Data Minimization

Data, Science and Society

Data-Driven Dystopia: an uninterrupted breach of ethics

Data as an economic good, data as a commons, and data governance

When the Body Became Data: Historical Data Cultures and Anatomical Illustration