Abstract:Purpose: The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within enterprises is generates significant technostress among employees, potentially influencing their intention to adopt AI. However, existing research on the psychological effects of this phenomenon remains inconclusive. Drawing on the Affective Events Theory (AET) and the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework (CHSF), the current study aims to explore the "black box" between challenge and hindrance technology stressors and employees' intention to adopt AI, as well as the boundary conditions of this mediation relationship. Methods: The study employs a quantitative approach and utilizes three-wave data. Data were collected through the snowball sampling technique and a structured questionnaire survey. The sample comprises employees from 11 distinct organizations located in Guangdong Province, China. We received 301 valid questionnaires, representing an overall response rate of 75%. The theoretical model was tested through confirmatory factor analysis and regression analyses using Mplus and the Process macro for SPSS. Results: The results indicate that positive affect mediates the positive relationship between challenge technology stressors and AI adoption intention, whereas AI anxiety mediates the negative relationship between hindrance technology stressors and AI adoption intention. Furthermore, the results reveal that technical self-efficacy moderates the effects of challenge and hindrance technology stressors on affective reactions and the indirect effects of challenge and hindrance technology stressors on AI adoption intention through positive affect and AI anxiety, respectively. Conclusion: Overall, our study suggests that AI-driven challenge technology stressors positively impact AI adoption intention through the cultivation of positive affect, while hindrance technology stressors impede AI adoption intention by triggering AI anxiety. Additionally, technical self-efficacy emerges as a crucial moderator in shaping these relationships. This research has the potential to make a meaningful contribution to the literature on AI adoption intention, deepening our holistic understanding of the influential mechanisms involved. Furthermore, the study affirms the applicability and relevance of Affective Events Theory (AET) and the Challenge-Hindrance Stressor Framework (CHSF). In practical terms, the research provides actionable insights for organizations to effectively manage employees' AI adoption intention.

The influence of subjective knowledge, technophobia and perceived enjoyment on design students' intention to use artificial intelligence design tools

A Study on Factors Influencing Designers' Behavioral Intention in Using AI-Generated Content for Assisted Design: Perceived Anxiety, Perceived Risk, and UTAUT

Analysis on the Acceptance of AIGC Technology by Art and Design Students in Universities in China

Research on designers’ behavioral intention toward Artificial Intelligence-Aided Design: integrating the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Technology Acceptance Model

Exploring the Key Factors Influencing College Students' Willingness to Use AI Coding Assistant Tools: An Expanded Technology Acceptance Model

An explanatory study of factors influencing engagement in AI education at the K-12 Level: an extension of the classic TAM model

University students' perspectives on Artificial Intelligence

Technology Acceptance and Innovation Diffusion: Are Users More Inclined Toward AIGC-Assisted Design?

Exploring the Perceptions and Continuance Intention of AI-Based Text-to-Image Technology in Supporting Design Ideation

An empirical study of factors influencing usage intention for generative artificial intelligence products: A case study of China

Understanding graphic designers' usage behavior of generative artificial intelligence tools

A Study on the Relationship between AI Anxiety and AI Behavioral Intention of Secondary School Students Learning English as a Foreign Language

What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended technology acceptance model

Determinants of College Students’ Actual Use of AI-Based Systems: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

Why do designers in various fields have different attitude and behavioral intention towards AI painting tools? an extended UTAUT model

Does AI-Driven Technostress Promote or Hinder Employees' Artificial Intelligence Adoption Intention? A Moderated Mediation Model of Affective Reactions and Technical Self-Efficacy

Modeling Students' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Language Learning

Exploring Factors of the Willingness to Accept AI-Assisted Learning Environments: An Empirical Investigation Based on the UTAUT Model and Perceived Risk Theory

The Impact of AI Usage on University Students’ Willingness for Autonomous Learning

Key Factors Influencing Design Learners' Behavioral Intention in Human-AI Collaboration Within the Educational Metaverse

Exploring Teachers’ Behavioural Intentions to Design Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Learning in Chinese K–12 Education