Moderators of training response to a driver inattention training program for teens with ADHD
Annie A. Garner,Jeffery N. Epstein,James Peugh,Leanne Tamm,Adam W. Kiefer,Ryan P. MacPherson,John O. Simon,Donald L. Fisher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2024.101766
IF: 3.613
2024-02-14
Journal of Transport & Health
Abstract:Introduction Long-glances away from the roadway—those that exceed 2 s—contribute significantly to driving risk among teen drivers with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). In a randomized controlled trial, teen drivers with ADHD assigned to a driver training program (enhanced FOcused Concentration and Attention Learning; FOCAL +) to reduce long-glances away from the roadway demonstrated significantly reduced rates of long-glances and improved simulated driving performance up to 6-months post training compared to teens in a modified conventional driver's training curriculum (control). Additionally, FOCAL + reduced real-world crash risk by 40 % in the year following training. The present study investigates whether age, executive function, IQ, and clinical comorbidities moderated response to FOCAL + training. Method This is a secondary analysis of the randomized control trial data. Differential response to FOCAL + training among the 152 teens with ADHD ( M age = 17.4; 94 % male) randomly assigned to FOCAL + or control was assessed using generalized estimating equations examining the interaction between each moderator variable, randomized group assignment, and time. Outcome variables included count of long-glances and lane position variability assessed during driving simulation at baseline and 1-month and 6-months post-training, and rates of long-glances and crashes/near-crashes during 1-year of naturalistic driving. Results Teens who were younger and had better executive functioning benefited most from FOCAL + training as evidenced by greater reductions in long-glances and lane variability during simulated driving. No baseline characteristic moderated FOCAL + impact on naturalistic driving outcomes. Conclusions Baseline moderator variables did not predict naturalistic driving outcomes and, thus, the impact of the FOCAL + training is a broad based one with wide applicability. However, some moderator variables did predict simulator driving outcomes. Findings suggest that FOCAL + offered at a young age may maximize impact, and that booster sessions might be necessary to maintain training effects for teens with worse executive functioning.
public, environmental & occupational health,transportation