Abstract:This paper addresses the strategic planning issue of ports in an inland river corridor with locationdependent waterway depths, which determine the maximum navigable ship sizes deployed in ports. A vertical-structure model is proposed to capture the interrelationships among port operators, carriers, and shippers. The shippers, who are assumed to be continuously distributed along the inland river corridor, choose transshipment ports to minimize their own full transport cost from origin to destination. The carriers aim to maximize their own profit by determining waterway freight rates and ship fleet (in terms of ship size and number of ships). The port operators determine port capacity and port service charge to achieve their own objective, depending on the port market structures adopted, i.e., coordinated vs. independent regime. Under the coordinated regime, the central government aims to maximize total social welfare of the entire inland river system. Under the independent regime, each local government along the inland river corridor maximizes the local social welfare of individual port inside its jurisdiction. The properties of the models with different regimes are analytically explored. Our study develops a comprehensive model that can be used to analyze the investment and regulatory decisions for an inland river shipping corridor composed of multiple heterogeneous ports. The modelling results suggest that local governments have a tendency to overinvest port capacity beyond system optimum. Therefore, in the choice of regulatory regimes, one needs to balance the costs of regulation vs. the avoidance of excessive investments under central government intervention. Findings specific to the Yangtze River inland shipping corridor are also provided.

Price-cutting or incentive? Differentiated competition between regional asymmetric ports

Modeling Incentive Strategies for Landside Integration in Multimodal Transport Chains

Optimal Concession Contract Between a Port Authority and Container-Terminal Operators by Revenue-Sharing Schemes with Quantity Discount

Port Choice Strategies for Container Carriers in China: a Case Study of the Bohai Bay Rim Port Cluster

Game Model for a New Inspection Regime of Port State Control under Different Reward and Punishment Conditions

Port Competition with Accessibility and Congestion: a Theoretical Framework and Literature Review on Empirical Studies

Intra-port demand coordination and inter-port competition: Ports' pricing strategies with congestion concerns

A Game-Theoretical Model of Port Competition on Intermodal Network and Pricing Strategy

Container Hub Port Competition and Cooperation in Northeast Asia

Study on the impact of subsidies for overlapping hinterland shippers on port competition

The Port Competitive Strategies with Network Externality

Effects of the Optimal Port Queuing Pricing on Arrival Decisions for Container Ships

Competitive inland port location and pricing problem: A perspective from the entering seaport

Disaster Prevention and Strategic Investment for Multiple Ports in a Region: Cooperation or Not

A Competition Model For Container Seaports Sharing Common Hinterland

Strategic Planning of Inland River Ports under Different Market Structures: Coordinated Vs. Independent Operating Regime

Strategic Integration of the Inland Port and Shipping Service for the Ocean Carrier

Game-Theoretical Models for Competition Analysis in A New Emerging Liner Container Shipping Market

The Research of the Regional Port Cooperation Based on Dynamic Cooperative Game Theory

Cooperation strategies for competing ports considering risk Linkages

Research on evolutionary game and stability of port cooperation