Effects of microplastics on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in the context of straw incorporation: A comparison with different types of soil

Hong Yu,Zheng Zhang,Ying Zhang,Qidao Song,Ping Fan,Beidou Xi,Wenbing Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117733
IF: 8.9
2021-11-01
Environmental Pollution
Abstract:<p>Plastic mulching and straw incorporation are common agricultural practices in China. Plastic mulching is suspected to be a significant source of microplastics in terrestrial environments. Straw incorporation has many effects on the storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) and greenhouse gas emissions, but these effects have not been studied in the presence of microplastic pollution. In this study, 365-day soil incubation experiments were conducted to assess the effects of maize straw and polyethylene microplastics on SOC fractions and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) emissions in two different soils (fluvo-aquic and latosol). Against the background of straw incorporation, microplastics reduced the mineralization and decomposition of SOC, resulting in a microbially available SOC content decrease by 18.9%. In addition, microplastics were carbon-rich, but relatively stable and difficult to be used by microorganisms, thus increasing the mineral-associated SOC content by 52.5%. This indicated that microplastics had adverse effects on microbially available SOC and positive effects on mineral-associated SOC. Microplastics also decreased coarse particulate SOC (&gt;250 μm), and increased non-aggregated silt and clay aggregated SOC (&lt;53 μm). Furthermore, microplastics changed microbial community compositions, thereby reducing the CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions of straw incorporation by 26.5%–33.9% and 35.4%–39.7%, respectively. These results showed that microplastics partially offset the increase of CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions induced by straw incorporation. Additionally, the inhibitory effect of microplastics on CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in fluvo-aquic soil was lower than that in latosol soil, whereas the inhibitory effect on N<sub>2</sub>O emissions had the opposite trend.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?