Therapeutic benefit of larotrectinib over the historical standard of care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic infantile fibrosarcoma (EPI VITRAKVI study)

D. Orbach,M. Carton,S.K. Khadir,M. Feuilly,M. Kurtinecz,C. Vokuhl,E. Koscielniak,G. Pierron,L. Lemelle,M. Sparber-Sauer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103006
IF: 6.883
2024-04-26
ESMO Open
Abstract:The likelihood of medical treatment failure was 80% lower with larotrectinib than with chemotherapy in patients with IFS. Sensitivity analyses, including exact matching and subgroup analyses for number of treatment lines, confirmed the results. Larotrectinib reduced the need of aggressive therapies/procedures when compared to conventional chemotherapy. The study contributed evidence on the role of this new drug even in the absence of a randomized controlled trial. Patients with infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) have shown strong and long-lasting responses to larotrectinib, a tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitor (TRKi), in single-arm clinical trials. Conventional chemotherapy has also shown important efficacy. But, until now, no comparative data exist. This study aims to assess the therapeutic benefit of larotrectinib over the current standard of care (SOC) of chemotherapy in paediatric patients with locally advanced or metastatic IFS. EPI VITRAKVI is a retrospective, observational, externally controlled study (NCT05236257). Data of patients aged ≤21 years with locally advanced or metastatic IFS treated with larotrectinib in the phase I/II SCOUT trial (NCT02637687) were compared with those of an external historical control group (data of Institut Curie and Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe) treated with a chemotherapy-based regimen. Between-group differences were assessed after balancing groups using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). In total, 93 patients were compared, 51 in the larotrectinib arm and 42 in the external control arm. After therapy, 4 patients (7.8%) in the larotrectinib group had a medical treatment failure event [start of new systemic treatment (2 cases), mutilating surgery (2 cases)] versus 15 (35.7%) in the external control group [start of new systemic treatment (6 cases), mutilating surgery (5 cases), radiation therapy (2 cases), and death (2 cases)]. Larotrectinib was associated with an 80% reduced likelihood of encountering a medical treatment failure event, when compared to the external control group (weighted and stratified hazard ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.63, P = 0.0060). These results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses, including exact matching, and subgroup analyses for number of lines of treatment. Treatment with larotrectinib reduced the need of subsequent therapies compared to SOC with chemotherapy in children with locally advanced or metastatic IFS, regardless of the line of treatment.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?