Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal complications prevail towards the architecture of mutual policy design between trade and climate change regimes. The recent literature on this topic is mainly focused on commons and has significantly ignored the existing regulatory constraints between both the regimes. Therefore, in this study relevant WTO and environmental laws are critically examined in order to bring another side of literally work on trade‐climate policy framework. Moreover, the time factor, role of developing countries and two approaches are also discussed that are important constituents to be considered during ongoing climate change multilateral talks. Design/methodology/approach This paper has six parts in total. Part one comprises of “Introduction”, part two gives “Overview of relevant WTO and climate change regulations”, part three describes “Antithesis of WTO and climate change rules” and explains the differences that both regimes posses in the basics of their nature, part four enumerates that how to galvanize the anticipated disputes among both the regimes, part five is focused on the participation of developing countries and their possible reservations towards climate policy and, part six gives some concluding remarks. Findings This study found four major points of caution while architecting climate change policy. First, the climate change policy gives excuse to certain economies to protect their domestic industry, which is supposedly the violation of WTO rules. Second, the disputes arise at WTO platform from the climate friendly trade policies would be a new inconvincible challenge. Third, the GATT article XX (general exceptions) and agreement on subsidies and countervailing measures (ASCM) are still not clearly defined under climate change regime. Fourth, the position of least developed countries (LDCs), there is no action plan as these countries are the most affected due to possible stringent trade‐climate policies. Research limitations/implications This research posses potential policy implication for both governments and international organizations, and provides new direction to trade and climate change researchers. It opens the way to critically examine the legal issues addressed in this paper which subsequently help both trade climate change regimes to overcome such regulatory differences with mutual consensus. Practical implications As policy implication this study suggests that what has been achieved during last two decades over climate change issue, and how long would it take to achieve the reasonable targets? In‐fact, the past work has succeeded to address the climate change as the global issue and it needs to be solved jointly but there is still a long way to make potential progress in order to architect the comprehensive policy and designing of multilateral agreements. It needs more time to constitute a climate change regime free from individual countries' political and economical interests and consensus amongst all major countries and group. Originality/value Most the current literature only focuses common options between trade and climate change policy regimes and significantly ignores the potential legal constraints. In this regards, this study fills existing gap in trade and climate change policy constraints and gives another new direction for policy makers.

Trade disputes and the climate

Modelling Trade and Climate Change Policy: A Strategic Framework for Global Environmental Negotiators

Environmental and economic impacts of trade barriers: The example of China–US trade friction

Domestic and foreign cap-and-trade regulations, carbon tariffs, and product tariffs during international trade conflicts: A multiproduct cost-efficiency analysis

Environmental regulations and international trade: A quantitative economic analysis of world pollution emissions

Carbon and health implications of trade restrictions

Trade uncertainty, emission cap and firm pollution

General Equilibrium Theory for Climate Change

Impacts of Trade Friction and Climate Policy on Global Energy Trade Network

The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy*

Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?

Trade Uncertainty and Firm Pollution: the Role of Emission Caps

The Impact on Carbon Emissions of China with the Trade Situation versus the U.S.

Global and National Environmental Impacts of the US-China Trade War

An Empirical Analysis of Influence from Measures Addressing Climate Change to Trade Competitiveness

Trade barriers

Effective climate clubs require ambition, leverage and insulation: Theorizing issue linkage in climate change and trade

Effects of a policy mix of uniform or unilateral environmental tax and trade liberalization on economic welfare

Governing Trade: a Cross-National Study of Governance, Trade, and CO2 Emissions

Climate Change and Trade Policy: from Legal Complications to Time Factor

Global firms and emissions: Investigating the dual channels of emissions abatement