Abstract:Background: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with lateral mass screws is a favorable treatment option to revise a symptomatic pseudarthrosis due to reliable rates of arthrodesis; however, this technique introduces elevated risk for wound infection and hospital readmission. A tissue-sparing PCF approach involving facet fixation instrumentation reduces the rates of postoperative complications while stabilizing the symptomatic level to achieve arthrodesis; however, these outcomes have been limited to small study cohorts from individual surgeons commonly with mixed indications for treatment. Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty cases were identified from a retrospective chart review performed by seven surgeons across six sites in the United States. All cases involved PCF revision for a pseudarthrosis at one or more levels from C3 to C7 following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). PCF was performed using a tissue-sparing technique with facet instrumentation. Cases involving additional supplemental fixation such as lateral mass screws, rods, wires, or other hardware were excluded. Demographics, operative notes, postoperative complications, hospital readmission, and subsequent surgical interventions were summarized as an entire cohort and according to the following risk factors: age, sex, number of levels revised, body mass index (BMI), and history of nicotine use. Results: The average age of patients at the time of PCF revision was 55 ± 11 years and 63% were female. The average BMI was 29 ± 6 kg/m2 and 19% reported a history of nicotine use. Postoperative follow-up visits were available with a median of 68 days (interquartile range = 41-209 days) from revision PCF. There were 91 1-level, 49 2-level, 8 3-level, and 2 4±-level PCF revision cases. The mean operative duration was 52 ± 3 min with an estimated blood loss of 14 ± 1.5cc. Participants were discharged an average of 1 ± 0.05 days following surgery. Multilevel treatment resulted in longer procedure times (single = 45 min, multi = 59 min, P = 0.01) but did not impact estimated blood loss (P = 0.94). Total nights in the hospital increased by 0.2 nights with multilevel treatment (P = 0.01). Sex, age, nicotine history, and BMI had no effect on recorded perioperative outcomes. There was one instance of rehospitalization due to deep-vein thrombosis, one instance of persistent pseudarthrosis at the revised level treated with ACDF, and four instances of adjacent segment disease. In patients initially treated with multilevel ACDF, revisions occurred most commonly on the caudal level (48% of revised levels), followed by the cranial (43%), and least often in the middle level (9%). Conclusions: This chart review of perioperative and safety outcomes provides evidence in support of tissue-sparing PCF with facet instrumentation as a treatment for symptomatic pseudarthrosis after ACDF. The most common locations requiring revision were the caudal and cranial levels. Operative duration and estimated blood loss were favorable when compared to open alternatives. There were no instances of postoperative wound infection, and the majority of patients were discharged the day following surgery.

Reoperation Rates According to Surgical Approach After Operation for Degenerative Cervical Pathology in Patients With Athetoid Cerebral Palsy: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Combined Anterior-Posterior Fusion Versus Posterior Alone Fusion for Cervical Myelopathy in Athetoid-Cerebral Palsy

Long-term surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy with athetoid cerebral palsy

Surgical outcomes of cervical myelopathy in patients with athetoid cerebral palsy

Surgical Outcomes of Cervical Myelopathy in Patients with Athetoid Cerebral Palsy: A 5-Year Follow-Up

Postoperative Complications of Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with and Without Athetoid Cerebral Palsy

Long-term reoperation rates following spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis in nonambulatory patients with cerebral palsy

Surgery for Spinal Stenosis in Achondroplasia: Causes of Reoperation and Reduction of Risks

Laminoplasty with Lateral Mass Screw Fixation for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy in Patients with Athetoid Cerebral Palsy: A Retrospective Study

Surgical Outcomes of Posterior Spinal Fusion Alone Using Cervical Pedicle Screw Constructs for Cervical Disorders Associated With Athetoid Cerebral Palsy

Revision Surgery after Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plate vs Stand-Alone Cage over 2 to 5 Year Follow-Up

[Reoperation for Cervical Myelopathy Duo to Progressing Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligaments in Patients with Expansive Laminoplasty].

1068 Incidence and Recovery of C5 Nerve Palsy After Various Types of Cervical Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Over 14,834 Patients

Perioperative and safety outcomes following tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion to revise a pseudarthrosis: A multicenter retrospective review of 150 cases

Revision Rates and Complication Incidence in Single- and Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures: an Administrative Database Study.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy

Cervical Range of Motion after Anterior Corpectomy and Fusion versus Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Three-Dimensional Comparison Based on Coda Motion System (vol 132C, pg e274, 2019)

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Epidemiological Review of 433,660 Surgical Patients from 2011-2021

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior decompression with fusion vs. posterior decompression with fixation in kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for the Treatment of Pincer Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

1076 3-Level ACDF Versus 3-Level Laminectomy and Fusion: Are There Differences in Outcomes? An Analysis of the QOD CSM Cohort