Abstract:The root cause of human conflict needs to be understood but it is currently unknown whether the decision to engage in conflict is an inherited or acquired trait. This article reports two experimental simulations which demonstrate that the level of confrontation in a population of simple organisms can be explained by the evolution of a simulated gene pool. Game theory and evolutionary algorithms were combined in a novel way to examine how six variables influenced the decision to confront in the competition for resources. The main variable was how the genetically determined rate of confrontation evolved as a function of environmental resources and cost of a conflict. The additional modulatory effects of four other variables were also considered in the first round of simulations. Two variables were responsive to the difference between resources and cost. Two other variables were responsive to the organism's health status. Taking a systematic approach, we examined how a population of 1000 organisms were evolving in environments with different levels of reward and punishment. During each cycle, each organism was paired with another organism and thus needed to decide whether to confront or cooperate. We used a genetic algorithm to simulate the evolution of the gene pool over 500 cycles. The first series of simulations demonstrated that the baseline rate of confrontation was very responsive to environmental conditions. Our results also indicate that the decision to confront or cooperate depended not only upon the immediate competitive conditions, in which the organisms evolved, but were also responsive to their own health status. The second series of simulations used zero‐sum games to explore how risk levels varied as a function of the potential cost of engaging in a confrontation. In the second round of simulations, a simple form of memory was implemented. The results indicated that memory had a limited, but significant effect, while the cost of a conflict was highly predictive of the level of risk taken by the organisms. Our two series of simulations show that AI could contribute to answering psychological and societal questions. Our unique combination of techniques has brought to light several new insights into the mechanisms that drive the population towards cooperation and confrontation. The degree of generalizability of our results and future avenues for deepening our understanding of these evolutionary dynamics are discussed.

How Genetic-Conflict Theory Can Inform Studies of Human Nature

Behavioral genetics and evolutionary psychology: unified perspective on personality research.

Living in a Genetic World: How Learning About Interethnic Genetic Similarities and Differences Affects Peace and Conflict

Mind the gap: why many geneticists and psychological scientists have discrepant views about gene-environment interaction (G×E) research.

The genomic case against genetic determinism

Confounding Fuels Misinterpretation in Human Genetics

The resolution of evolutionary conflicts within species

Confronting scientific racism in psychology: Lessons from evolutionary biology and genetics.

Darwinism, behavioral genetics, and organizational behavior: a review and agenda for future research

On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation

Parallels and promising directions in the study of genetic, cultural, and moral evolution

Public Understanding of Behavioral Genetics: Integrating Heuristic Thinking, Motivated Reasoning and Planned Social Change Theories for Better Communication Strategies

Evolution of confrontation and cooperation in simple organisms as a function of environmental resources and cost of a conflict

Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution

Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern

What Do We Know About the Genetic Architecture of Psychopathology?

The sociopolitical in human genetics education

The genetics revolution. Ethical, legal, and insurance concerns

ON THE BEHAVIORAL GENETICS ORIENTATION INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES

Genetic conflict and its resolution between the sexes

Gene-culture interaction on human behavior and the brain